Improving Trauma Surgeons Prospective Estimation of the Injury Severity Score

Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a prospective predictive variable is limited, as it is scored post-discharge by registrars. We followed a phase 1 pilot investigation of the feasibility of prospective ISS estimation (eISS) by trauma surgeons within 1 day of admission with an investigation of the impact of a simple educational aid on the accuracy of these estimations. Eleven surgeons evaluated 178 patients in phase 2. With the educational aid, ISS concordance improved from 74.6% to 85.1% for non-severe (abstracted ISS, aISS <16) injuries and from 78.8% to 83.1% for severe (aISS ≥16) injuries; weighted <i>k</i> improved from 0.53 to 0.72. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) concordance similarly improved in five of seven body regions. The ability to prospectively document ISS has important clinical and research implications. There remains opportunity to refine educational aides and harness the EHR to further improve prediction accuracy and facilitate adoption in standard clinical workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241300365
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Trauma Surgeons Prospective Estimation of the Injury Severity Score

W. Matthew Vassy, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, Gina Solomon, Morgan A. Krause et al.
The American Surgeon
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Improving Trauma Surgeons Prospective Estimation of the Injury Severity Score

W. Matthew Vassy, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, Gina Solomon, Morgan A. Krause, Christopher J. Dente, Eli Mlaver, S. Rob Todd
article en

Abstract

Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a prospective predictive variable is limited, as it is scored post-discharge by registrars. We followed a phase 1 pilot investigation of the feasibility of prospective ISS estimation (eISS) by trauma surgeons within 1 day of admission with an investigation of the impact of a simple educational aid on the accuracy of these estimations. Eleven surgeons evaluated 178 patients in phase 2. With the educational aid, ISS concordance improved from 74.6% to 85.1% for non-severe (abstracted ISS, aISS <16) injuries and from 78.8% to 83.1% for severe (aISS ≥16) injuries; weighted <i>k</i> improved from 0.53 to 0.72. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) concordance similarly improved in five of seven body regions. The ability to prospectively document ISS has important clinical and research implications. There remains opportunity to refine educational aides and harness the EHR to further improve prediction accuracy and facilitate adoption in standard clinical workflows.

The American SurgeonVol. 91(3)
Emory University (US), Northeast Georgia Medical Center (US), Morehouse College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Trauma Surgeons Prospective Estimation of the Injury Severity Score — W. Matthew Vassy, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, et al. · The American Surgeon (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS