Comparing the performance of a femoral shaft fracture fixation using implants with biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials.

Orthopedic injuries, such as femur shaft fractures, often require surgical intervention to promote healing and functional recovery. Metal plate implants are widely used due to their mechanical strength and biocompatibility. Biodegradable metal plate implants, including those made from magnesium, zinc, and iron alloys, offer distinct advantages over non-biodegradable materials like stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt alloys. Biodegradable implants gradually replace native bone tissue, reducing the need for additional surgeries and improving patient recovery. However, non-biodegradable implants remain popular due to their stability, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. This study focuses on designing an implant plate for treating transverse femoral shaft fractures during the walking cycle. The primary objective is to conduct a comprehensive finite element analysis (FEA) of a fractured femur's stabilization using various biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials. The study assesses the efficacy of different implant materials, discusses implant design, and identifies the optimal materials for femoral stabilization. Results indicate that magnesium alloy is superior among biodegradable materials, while titanium alloy is preferred among non-biodegradable options. The findings suggest that magnesium alloy is the recommended material for bone implants due to its advantages over non-degradable alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad90e7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the performance of a femoral shaft fracture fixation using implants with biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials.

Farid Vakili‐Tahami, Sina Taghipour, Tajbakhsh Navid Chakherlou
4 citations
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.29
article

Comparing the performance of a femoral shaft fracture fixation using implants with biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials.

Farid Vakili‐Tahami, Sina Taghipour, Tajbakhsh Navid Chakherlou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Orthopedic injuries, such as femur shaft fractures, often require surgical intervention to promote healing and functional recovery. Metal plate implants are widely used due to their mechanical strength and biocompatibility. Biodegradable metal plate implants, including those made from magnesium, zinc, and iron alloys, offer distinct advantages over non-biodegradable materials like stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt alloys. Biodegradable implants gradually replace native bone tissue, reducing the need for additional surgeries and improving patient recovery. However, non-biodegradable implants remain popular due to their stability, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. This study focuses on designing an implant plate for treating transverse femoral shaft fractures during the walking cycle. The primary objective is to conduct a comprehensive finite element analysis (FEA) of a fractured femur's stabilization using various biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials. The study assesses the efficacy of different implant materials, discusses implant design, and identifies the optimal materials for femoral stabilization. Results indicate that magnesium alloy is superior among biodegradable materials, while titanium alloy is preferred among non-biodegradable options. The findings suggest that magnesium alloy is the recommended material for bone implants due to its advantages over non-degradable alternatives.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(1)
University of Tabriz (IR), Tabriz Islamic Arts University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.