Correlation of the L-mode density limit with edge collisionality

Abstract The ‘density limit’ is one of the fundamental bounds on tokamak operating space, and is commonly estimated via the empirical Greenwald scaling. This limit has garnered renewed interest in recent years as it has become clear that ITER and many tokamak pilot plant concepts must operate near or above the Greenwald limit to achieve their objectives. Evidence has also grown that the Greenwald scaling—in its remarkable simplicity—may not capture the full complexity of the density limit. In this study, we assemble a multi-machine database to quantify the effectiveness of the Greenwald limit as a predictor of the L-mode density limit and compare it with data-driven approaches. We find that a boundary in the plasma edge involving dimensionless collisionality and pressure, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>edge</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>limit</mml:mtext> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext>edge</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , achieves significantly higher accuracy (false positive rate (FPR) of 2.3% at a true positive rate (TPR) of 95%) of predicting density limit disruptions than the Greenwald limit (FPR of 13.4% at a TPR of 95%) across a multi-machine dataset including metal- and carbon-wall tokamaks (AUG, C-Mod, DIII-D, and TCV). This two-parameter boundary succeeds at predicting L-mode density limits by robustly identifying the radiative state preceding the terminal MHD instability. This boundary can be applied for density limit avoidance in current devices and in ITER, where it can be measured and responded to in real time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad90f0
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of the L-mode density limit with edge collisionality

A. Pau, Cristina Rea, R. Granetz, Bingjia Xiao et al.
10 citations
Nuclear Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
6.60
article

Correlation of the L-mode density limit with edge collisionality

A. Pau, Cristina Rea, R. Granetz, Bingjia Xiao, Assimo Maris, Wenhui Hu, E. S. Marmar
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ‘density limit’ is one of the fundamental bounds on tokamak operating space, and is commonly estimated via the empirical Greenwald scaling. This limit has garnered renewed interest in recent years as it has become clear that ITER and many tokamak pilot plant concepts must operate near or above the Greenwald limit to achieve their objectives. Evidence has also grown that the Greenwald scaling—in its remarkable simplicity—may not capture the full complexity of the density limit. In this study, we assemble a multi-machine database to quantify the effectiveness of the Greenwald limit as a predictor of the L-mode density limit and compare it with data-driven approaches. We find that a boundary in the plasma edge involving dimensionless collisionality and pressure, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>edge</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>limit</mml:mtext> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext>edge</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , achieves significantly higher accuracy (false positive rate (FPR) of 2.3% at a true positive rate (TPR) of 95%) of predicting density limit disruptions than the Greenwald limit (FPR of 13.4% at a TPR of 95%) across a multi-machine dataset including metal- and carbon-wall tokamaks (AUG, C-Mod, DIII-D, and TCV). This two-parameter boundary succeeds at predicting L-mode density limits by robustly identifying the radiative state preceding the terminal MHD instability. This boundary can be applied for density limit avoidance in current devices and in ITER, where it can be measured and responded to in real time.

Nuclear FusionVol. 65(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (CN), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, EUROfusion, European Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, International Atomic Energy Agency, Office of Science, Euratom Research and Training Programme, Fusion Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
6.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.