Remote workers’ well-being: Are innovative organizations really concerned? A bibliometrics analysis

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of remote and hybrid forms of work in organizations. Despite the benefits that these flexible working models can bring to both employees and organizations, they are accompanied by a darker side. Heavy digital presence, increased workload, and blurred boundaries between work and life are some of the hindrances derived from remote working that directly affect employee well-being. Aware of the negative consequences that can lead to individual and organizational performance, companies are expected to define and adapt policies and regulations to protect employees and promote their well-being. However, literature addressing these research topics is scarce, and many contributions are dispersed across different fields. Therefore, we address this research gap by performing a bibliometric analysis of the contributions to remote employee well-being and complementing it with a content analysis. A sample of 64 publications was collected from two different databases. This study provides a performance measurement analysis of publications and citations and a scientific mapping of collaboration networks and emerging thematic trends. Furthermore, the content analysis allows us to understand how the organizational perspective on the well-being of employees in remote working settings has been addressed in the literature, clearly identifying opportunities for future research. Finally, the major challenges and research agendas are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100595
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote workers’ well-being: Are innovative organizations really concerned? A bibliometrics analysis

Filipa Pires da Silva, Pedro Rino Vieira, Joana Filipa Monteiro Ribeiro
11 citations
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
18.79
article

Remote workers’ well-being: Are innovative organizations really concerned? A bibliometrics analysis

Filipa Pires da Silva, Pedro Rino Vieira, Joana Filipa Monteiro Ribeiro
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of remote and hybrid forms of work in organizations. Despite the benefits that these flexible working models can bring to both employees and organizations, they are accompanied by a darker side. Heavy digital presence, increased workload, and blurred boundaries between work and life are some of the hindrances derived from remote working that directly affect employee well-being. Aware of the negative consequences that can lead to individual and organizational performance, companies are expected to define and adapt policies and regulations to protect employees and promote their well-being. However, literature addressing these research topics is scarce, and many contributions are dispersed across different fields. Therefore, we address this research gap by performing a bibliometric analysis of the contributions to remote employee well-being and complementing it with a content analysis. A sample of 64 publications was collected from two different databases. This study provides a performance measurement analysis of publications and citations and a scientific mapping of collaboration networks and emerging thematic trends. Furthermore, the content analysis allows us to understand how the organizational perspective on the well-being of employees in remote working settings has been addressed in the literature, clearly identifying opportunities for future research. Finally, the major challenges and research agendas are discussed.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 9(4)
University of Lisbon (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Remote workers’ well-being: Are innovative organizations really concerned? A bibliometrics analysis — Filipa Pires da Silva, Pedro Rino Vieira, et al. · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS