CTNI-47. A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN IDH1-MUTANT DIFFUSE GLIOMA: UPDATED RESULTS

Abstract BACKGROUND Vorasidenib (VOR) and ivosidenib (IVO) showed clinical activity in subjects with isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant (mIDH) gliomas. We evaluated both agents in a phase 1, randomized, open-label perioperative trial (NCT03343197). Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary objective response rate (ORR) data as of 29-April-2020 were previously reported (Mellinghoff et al. Nat Med. 2023). Progression-free survival (PFS) data were not mature at publication time. We report here longer-term follow-up results, including mature PFS. METHODS Participants with grade 2/3 non-enhancing mIDH1 R132H mutant gliomas were randomized to VOR (50 or 10 mg QD), IVO (500 or 250 mg BID), or no treatment (control) for 4 weeks prior to planned surgery, with the option to continue treatment with VOR or IVO post-surgery. Secondary objectives included PFS, ORR assessed by Investigator in the post-surgery period, and safety profile of VOR and IVO. RESULTS Enrollment completed in April-2019. 49 participants were randomized, of which 46 participants (24 oligodendroglioma, 20 astrocytoma, 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 1 anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) received treatment with either VOR (N=24) or IVO (N=22) after surgery. As of 23-September-2023 data cutoff, 11 (46%) and 5 (20%) participants remain on treatment for VOR and IVO, respectively. Median (range) post-operative treatment duration was 44.7 months (0.9–62.7) for VOR, 23.9 months (0–62.7) for IVO. Median (95% CI) PFS was 41.4 months (9.3, NE) for VOR and 38.6 months (18.3, NE) for IVO. ORR per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) was 46% for VOR and 27% for IVO. Longer safety follow up will also be presented. CONCLUSION These results provide further evidence of prolonged response using IVO and VOR immediately following surgery in predominantly non-enhancing gliomas. This longer-term follow-up is consistent with Phase 3 INDIGO study results where VOR demonstrated PFS benefit with manageable safety compared with placebo in participants with non-enhancing mIDH gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0414
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-47. A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN IDH1-MUTANT DIFFUSE GLIOMA: UPDATED RESULTS

Lori Steelman, Islam Hassan, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Patrick Yung Wen et al.
2 citations
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.88
article

CTNI-47. A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PERIOPERATIVE TRIAL OF VORASIDENIB AND IVOSIDENIB IN IDH1-MUTANT DIFFUSE GLIOMA: UPDATED RESULTS

Lori Steelman, Islam Hassan, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Patrick Yung Wen, Isabel Arrillaga‐Romany, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Jennifer Clarke, Elizabeth Taylor, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Jennie Taylor, Estelle Baron, Paria Mahboub-Johnson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Vorasidenib (VOR) and ivosidenib (IVO) showed clinical activity in subjects with isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant (mIDH) gliomas. We evaluated both agents in a phase 1, randomized, open-label perioperative trial (NCT03343197). Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary objective response rate (ORR) data as of 29-April-2020 were previously reported (Mellinghoff et al. Nat Med. 2023). Progression-free survival (PFS) data were not mature at publication time. We report here longer-term follow-up results, including mature PFS. METHODS Participants with grade 2/3 non-enhancing mIDH1 R132H mutant gliomas were randomized to VOR (50 or 10 mg QD), IVO (500 or 250 mg BID), or no treatment (control) for 4 weeks prior to planned surgery, with the option to continue treatment with VOR or IVO post-surgery. Secondary objectives included PFS, ORR assessed by Investigator in the post-surgery period, and safety profile of VOR and IVO. RESULTS Enrollment completed in April-2019. 49 participants were randomized, of which 46 participants (24 oligodendroglioma, 20 astrocytoma, 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 1 anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) received treatment with either VOR (N=24) or IVO (N=22) after surgery. As of 23-September-2023 data cutoff, 11 (46%) and 5 (20%) participants remain on treatment for VOR and IVO, respectively. Median (range) post-operative treatment duration was 44.7 months (0.9–62.7) for VOR, 23.9 months (0–62.7) for IVO. Median (95% CI) PFS was 41.4 months (9.3, NE) for VOR and 38.6 months (18.3, NE) for IVO. ORR per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) was 46% for VOR and 27% for IVO. Longer safety follow up will also be presented. CONCLUSION These results provide further evidence of prolonged response using IVO and VOR immediately following surgery in predominantly non-enhancing gliomas. This longer-term follow-up is consistent with Phase 3 INDIGO study results where VOR demonstrated PFS benefit with manageable safety compared with placebo in participants with non-enhancing mIDH gliomas.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.