CTNI-50. CLINICAL EFFICACY AND PK/PD RESPONSE IN A PHASE 0/2 STUDY OF NIRAPARIB PLUS RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY-DIAGNOSED, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA
Abstract BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is a PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0/2 study evaluates tumor pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical efficacy of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 (cohort 1) or 8-10 hours (cohort 2) following the last dose. Tumor tissue (gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation vs non-irradiated control. A PK response was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors and a PK response were eligible for Phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by niraparib monotherapy. RESULTS All Phase 0 patients (n=46) met the PK threshold. The mean unbound concentrations of niraparib in non-enhancing tumor regions were 335.1 nM (cohort 1; n=43) and 331.9 nM (cohort 2; n=3). Ex vivo PAR suppression was observed in 73% of the patients (24/33). 71.4% patients with unmethylated tumors were enrolled into Phase 2. Five patients in Phase 2 experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib and all adverse events resolved without sequelae. At a mean clinical follow-up of 13.4 months, median overall survival was 20.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Niraparib achieves pharmacologically relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue. Accompanying PD effects were observed in tumor tissue, no new safety signals were observed, and clinical outcomes were promising. A global Phase 3, open-label, randomized 2-arm study comparing niraparib versus temozolomide in adult patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma is underway.
Authors
- Michael A. Garcia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-2234)
- William R. Kennedy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-1345)
- Wonsuk Yoo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-2399)
- Yoshie Umemura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-661X)
- Nader Sanai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-0516)
- Shwetal Mehta
- Jennifer K. Molloy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-6632)
- Tigran Margaryan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-8821)
- Hualin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-0107)
- John E. Wanebo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-2938)
- Amy Hong
- Artak Tovmasyan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8612-1676)
- An‐Chi Tien (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-4044)
- Jocelyn Harmon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5684-1907)
- William A. Knight
- Igor J. Barani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8256-1906)
- Kelly Braun
Institutions
- Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0417
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00