CTNI-50. CLINICAL EFFICACY AND PK/PD RESPONSE IN A PHASE 0/2 STUDY OF NIRAPARIB PLUS RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY-DIAGNOSED, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is a PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0/2 study evaluates tumor pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical efficacy of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 (cohort 1) or 8-10 hours (cohort 2) following the last dose. Tumor tissue (gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation vs non-irradiated control. A PK response was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors and a PK response were eligible for Phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by niraparib monotherapy. RESULTS All Phase 0 patients (n=46) met the PK threshold. The mean unbound concentrations of niraparib in non-enhancing tumor regions were 335.1 nM (cohort 1; n=43) and 331.9 nM (cohort 2; n=3). Ex vivo PAR suppression was observed in 73% of the patients (24/33). 71.4% patients with unmethylated tumors were enrolled into Phase 2. Five patients in Phase 2 experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib and all adverse events resolved without sequelae. At a mean clinical follow-up of 13.4 months, median overall survival was 20.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Niraparib achieves pharmacologically relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue. Accompanying PD effects were observed in tumor tissue, no new safety signals were observed, and clinical outcomes were promising. A global Phase 3, open-label, randomized 2-arm study comparing niraparib versus temozolomide in adult patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma is underway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0417
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-50. CLINICAL EFFICACY AND PK/PD RESPONSE IN A PHASE 0/2 STUDY OF NIRAPARIB PLUS RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY-DIAGNOSED, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

Michael A. Garcia, William R. Kennedy, Wonsuk Yoo, Yoshie Umemura et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

CTNI-50. CLINICAL EFFICACY AND PK/PD RESPONSE IN A PHASE 0/2 STUDY OF NIRAPARIB PLUS RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY-DIAGNOSED, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

Michael A. Garcia, William R. Kennedy, Wonsuk Yoo, Yoshie Umemura, Nader Sanai, Shwetal Mehta, Jennifer K. Molloy, Tigran Margaryan, Hualin Zhang, John E. Wanebo, Amy Hong, Artak Tovmasyan, An‐Chi Tien, Jocelyn Harmon, William A. Knight, Igor J. Barani, Kelly Braun
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is a PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0/2 study evaluates tumor pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical efficacy of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 (cohort 1) or 8-10 hours (cohort 2) following the last dose. Tumor tissue (gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation vs non-irradiated control. A PK response was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors and a PK response were eligible for Phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by niraparib monotherapy. RESULTS All Phase 0 patients (n=46) met the PK threshold. The mean unbound concentrations of niraparib in non-enhancing tumor regions were 335.1 nM (cohort 1; n=43) and 331.9 nM (cohort 2; n=3). Ex vivo PAR suppression was observed in 73% of the patients (24/33). 71.4% patients with unmethylated tumors were enrolled into Phase 2. Five patients in Phase 2 experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib and all adverse events resolved without sequelae. At a mean clinical follow-up of 13.4 months, median overall survival was 20.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Niraparib achieves pharmacologically relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue. Accompanying PD effects were observed in tumor tissue, no new safety signals were observed, and clinical outcomes were promising. A global Phase 3, open-label, randomized 2-arm study comparing niraparib versus temozolomide in adult patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma is underway.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.