Misattribution stigma and contagion: How did the art auction market react to Australian “Black art scandals”?

Abstract In 1999, two major stories hit the media concerning the authenticity of artworks by two of Australia’s leading Indigenous artists. The incidents were quickly tagged as ‘Black art scandals’, with the artists disavowing production of the artworks in question. We theorize the market impacts using the lens of stigma, given that, in the art market, uncovering fakes and forgeries may create a panic among buyers of an artist. Our proposed mechanism is that negative media attention about works misattributed to an artist stigmatizes the artist’s name and their artworks. We also note the potential stigma transfer to other artists in a style or genre (category-level contagion). Our results show a decline in the clearance rate and some weak evidence of a fall in the value of sales for auctions occurring after the news stories broke. We suggest stigma as a lens for future work in cultural economics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Economics
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-024-09526-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misattribution stigma and contagion: How did the art auction market react to Australian “Black art scandals”?

Tim R. L. Fry, Erica Coslor
2 citations
Journal of Cultural Economics
Art History and Market Analysis
12.98
article

Misattribution stigma and contagion: How did the art auction market react to Australian “Black art scandals”?

Tim R. L. Fry, Erica Coslor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In 1999, two major stories hit the media concerning the authenticity of artworks by two of Australia’s leading Indigenous artists. The incidents were quickly tagged as ‘Black art scandals’, with the artists disavowing production of the artworks in question. We theorize the market impacts using the lens of stigma, given that, in the art market, uncovering fakes and forgeries may create a panic among buyers of an artist. Our proposed mechanism is that negative media attention about works misattributed to an artist stigmatizes the artist’s name and their artworks. We also note the potential stigma transfer to other artists in a style or genre (category-level contagion). Our results show a decline in the clearance rate and some weak evidence of a fall in the value of sales for auctions occurring after the news stories broke. We suggest stigma as a lens for future work in cultural economics.

Journal of Cultural EconomicsVol. 49(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Art History and Market Analysis
12.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misattribution stigma and contagion: How did the art auction market react to Australian “Black art scandals”? — Tim R. L. Fry, Erica Coslor · Journal of Cultural Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS