Global maternal health country typologies: A framework to guide policy

Maternal mortality remains a large challenge in global health. Learning from the experience of similar countries can help to accelerate progress. In this analysis we develop a typology of country groupings for maternal health and provide guidance on how policy implications vary by country typology. We used estimates from the Global Maternal Health (GMatH) microsimulation model, which was empirically calibrated to a range of fertility, process, and mortality indicators and provides estimates for 200 countries and territories. We used the 2022 estimates of the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) and lifetime risk of maternal death (LTR) and used a k-means clustering algorithm to define groups of countries based on these indicators. We estimated the means of other maternal indicators for each group, as well as the mean impact of different policy interventions. We identified 7 groups (A-G) of country typologies with different salient features. High burden countries (A-B) generally have MMRs above 500 and LTRs above 2%, and account for nearly 25% of global maternal deaths. Countries in these groups are estimated to benefit most from improving access to family planning and increasing facility births. Middle burden countries (C-E) generally have MMRs between 100-500 and LTRs between 0.5%-3%. Countries in these groups account for 55% of global maternal deaths and would benefit most from increasing facility births and improving quality of care. Low burden countries (F-G) generally have MMRs below 100 and LTRs below 0.5%, account for 20% of global maternal deaths, and would benefit most from improving access to family planning and community-based interventions and linkages to care. Indicators vary widely across groups, but also within groups, highlighting the importance of considering multiple indicators when assessing progress in maternal health. Policy impacts also differ by country typology, providing policymakers with information to help prioritize interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003867
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global maternal health country typologies: A framework to guide policy

Zachary J. Ward, Gary King, Rifat Atun, Brenda Sequeira Dmello et al.
3 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.33
article

Global maternal health country typologies: A framework to guide policy

Zachary J. Ward, Gary King, Rifat Atun, Brenda Sequeira Dmello, Sue J. Goldie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Maternal mortality remains a large challenge in global health. Learning from the experience of similar countries can help to accelerate progress. In this analysis we develop a typology of country groupings for maternal health and provide guidance on how policy implications vary by country typology. We used estimates from the Global Maternal Health (GMatH) microsimulation model, which was empirically calibrated to a range of fertility, process, and mortality indicators and provides estimates for 200 countries and territories. We used the 2022 estimates of the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) and lifetime risk of maternal death (LTR) and used a k-means clustering algorithm to define groups of countries based on these indicators. We estimated the means of other maternal indicators for each group, as well as the mean impact of different policy interventions. We identified 7 groups (A-G) of country typologies with different salient features. High burden countries (A-B) generally have MMRs above 500 and LTRs above 2%, and account for nearly 25% of global maternal deaths. Countries in these groups are estimated to benefit most from improving access to family planning and increasing facility births. Middle burden countries (C-E) generally have MMRs between 100-500 and LTRs between 0.5%-3%. Countries in these groups account for 55% of global maternal deaths and would benefit most from increasing facility births and improving quality of care. Low burden countries (F-G) generally have MMRs below 100 and LTRs below 0.5%, account for 20% of global maternal deaths, and would benefit most from improving access to family planning and community-based interventions and linkages to care. Indicators vary widely across groups, but also within groups, highlighting the importance of considering multiple indicators when assessing progress in maternal health. Policy impacts also differ by country typology, providing policymakers with information to help prioritize interventions.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 4(11)
Harvard University (US), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.