Free Speech, DEI, and Deplatforming: A Critical Analysis

Abstract Introduction: In recent years, the number of deplatforming attempts has increased at universities. Deplatforming is an attempt to block a person from speaking when certain groups find their content to be objectionable. An institution’s culture of free speech may affect the number of deplatforming incidents. Methods: This study utilized data from a new database of deplatforming incidents on campus. The data were tested for correlations in relation to an institution’s free speech ranking and its level of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) staffing. Results: These initial results show a negative relationship between free speech ranking and deplatforming incidents, and a positive relationship between DEI staffing and deplatforming incidents. Discussion: Institutions face the challenge of balancing an inclusive and equitable environment with the preservation of robust intellectual diversity and academic freedom. Finding this balance requires a thoughtful and deliberate approach that considers the nuances of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion while safeguarding the principles of free expression and open dialogue. Limitations: These results were only for Power 5 universities in the United States. A more diverse sample may show different results. Conclusions: The culture of an institution is related to the number of deplatforming incidents that take place. This culture can be examined via its commitment to free speech and to its DEI staffing levels. Initial results show that these two factors have a relationship with the number of deplatforming incidents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Educationis Generalis
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2024-0018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Free Speech, DEI, and Deplatforming: A Critical Analysis

Matthew Metzgar
1 citations
Acta Educationis Generalis
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
article

Free Speech, DEI, and Deplatforming: A Critical Analysis

Matthew Metzgar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: In recent years, the number of deplatforming attempts has increased at universities. Deplatforming is an attempt to block a person from speaking when certain groups find their content to be objectionable. An institution’s culture of free speech may affect the number of deplatforming incidents. Methods: This study utilized data from a new database of deplatforming incidents on campus. The data were tested for correlations in relation to an institution’s free speech ranking and its level of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) staffing. Results: These initial results show a negative relationship between free speech ranking and deplatforming incidents, and a positive relationship between DEI staffing and deplatforming incidents. Discussion: Institutions face the challenge of balancing an inclusive and equitable environment with the preservation of robust intellectual diversity and academic freedom. Finding this balance requires a thoughtful and deliberate approach that considers the nuances of promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion while safeguarding the principles of free expression and open dialogue. Limitations: These results were only for Power 5 universities in the United States. A more diverse sample may show different results. Conclusions: The culture of an institution is related to the number of deplatforming incidents that take place. This culture can be examined via its commitment to free speech and to its DEI staffing levels. Initial results show that these two factors have a relationship with the number of deplatforming incidents.

Acta Educationis GeneralisVol. 14(3)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.