Assessment of Vegetation Drought Loss and Recovery in Central Asia Considering a Comprehensive Vegetation Index

In the context of drought events caused by global warming, there is limited understanding of vegetation loss caused by drought and the subsequent recovery of vegetation after drought ends. However, employing a single index representing a specific vegetation characteristic to explore drought’s impact on vegetation may overlook vegetation features and introduce increased uncertainty. We applied the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), fraction of vegetation cover (FVC), gross primary production (GPP), leaf area index (LAI), and our constructed remote sensing vegetation index (RSVI) to assess vegetation drought in Central Asia. We analyzed the differences in drought experiences for different climatic regions and vegetation types and vegetation loss and recovery following drought events. The results indicate that during drought years (2012 and 2019), the differences in vegetation drought across climatic regions were considerable. The vegetation in arid, semiarid, and Mediterranean climate regions was more susceptible to drought. The different indices used to assess vegetation loss exhibited varying degrees of dynamic changes, with vegetation in a state of mild drought experiencing more significantly during drought events. The different vegetation assessment indices exhibited significant variations during the drought recovery periods (with a recovery period of 16 days: EVI of 85%, FVC of 50%, GPP of 84%, LAI of 61%, and RSVI of 44%). Moreover, the required recovery periods tended to decrease from arid to humid climates, influenced by both climate regions and vegetation types. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the primary climatic factors leading to vegetation loss varied depending on the assessment indices used. The proposed RSVI demonstrates high sensitivity, correlation, and interpretability to dry–wet variations and can be used to assess the impact of drought on vegetation. These findings are essential for water resource management and the implementation of measures that mitigate vegetation drought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224189
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Vegetation Drought Loss and Recovery in Central Asia Considering a Comprehensive Vegetation Index

Jingyun Guan, Wanqiang Han, Chuqiao Han, Xurui Mao et al.
6 citations
Remote Sensing
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.70
article

Assessment of Vegetation Drought Loss and Recovery in Central Asia Considering a Comprehensive Vegetation Index

Jingyun Guan, Wanqiang Han, Chuqiao Han, Xurui Mao, Jianhao Li, Ruikang Tian, Congren Li, Liang Liu, Yujia Liu, Jianghua Zheng
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In the context of drought events caused by global warming, there is limited understanding of vegetation loss caused by drought and the subsequent recovery of vegetation after drought ends. However, employing a single index representing a specific vegetation characteristic to explore drought’s impact on vegetation may overlook vegetation features and introduce increased uncertainty. We applied the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), fraction of vegetation cover (FVC), gross primary production (GPP), leaf area index (LAI), and our constructed remote sensing vegetation index (RSVI) to assess vegetation drought in Central Asia. We analyzed the differences in drought experiences for different climatic regions and vegetation types and vegetation loss and recovery following drought events. The results indicate that during drought years (2012 and 2019), the differences in vegetation drought across climatic regions were considerable. The vegetation in arid, semiarid, and Mediterranean climate regions was more susceptible to drought. The different indices used to assess vegetation loss exhibited varying degrees of dynamic changes, with vegetation in a state of mild drought experiencing more significantly during drought events. The different vegetation assessment indices exhibited significant variations during the drought recovery periods (with a recovery period of 16 days: EVI of 85%, FVC of 50%, GPP of 84%, LAI of 61%, and RSVI of 44%). Moreover, the required recovery periods tended to decrease from arid to humid climates, influenced by both climate regions and vegetation types. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the primary climatic factors leading to vegetation loss varied depending on the assessment indices used. The proposed RSVI demonstrates high sensitivity, correlation, and interpretability to dry–wet variations and can be used to assess the impact of drought on vegetation. These findings are essential for water resource management and the implementation of measures that mitigate vegetation drought.

Remote SensingVol. 16(22)
Xinjiang University (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.