Temporal cross‐validation in forecasting: A case study of COVID‐19 incidence using wastewater data

Abstract Two predominant methodologies in forecasting temporal processes include traditional time series models and machine learning methods. This paper investigates the impact of time series cross‐validation (TSCV) on both approaches in the context of a case study predicting the incidence of COVID‐19 based on wastewater data. The TSCV framework outlined in the paper begins by engineering interpretable features hypothesized as potential predictors of COVID‐19 incidence. Feature selection and hyperparameter tuning are then utilized with TSCV to identify the best features and hyperparameters for optimal model performance given a specific forecast horizon. While evidence supporting the utility of TSCV for auto‐regressive integrated moving average model with exogenous variables (TS‐ARIMAX) forecasts is lacking in this study, such an approach proves advantageous for gradient boosting machine forecasts (TS‐GBM). In Wyoming, for instance, TS‐GBM had a 34.9% improvement compared to naïve predictions, whereas GBM without TSCV only had a 15.6% improvement. However, TSCV also enhances interpretability for both TS‐ARIMAX and TS‐GBM models as this approach selects specific features, such as lagged values of COVID‐19 cases, based on forecast performance and forecast length. Future research should work to explore the influence of stationarity and model averaging on the performance of TSCV in forecasting applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3686
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal cross‐validation in forecasting: A case study of COVID‐19 incidence using wastewater data

Shaun S. Wulff, Timothy J. Robinson, Mallory Lai, Yongtao Cao et al.
2 citations
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.98
article

Temporal cross‐validation in forecasting: A case study of COVID‐19 incidence using wastewater data

Shaun S. Wulff, Timothy J. Robinson, Mallory Lai, Yongtao Cao, Rasika Rajapaksha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Two predominant methodologies in forecasting temporal processes include traditional time series models and machine learning methods. This paper investigates the impact of time series cross‐validation (TSCV) on both approaches in the context of a case study predicting the incidence of COVID‐19 based on wastewater data. The TSCV framework outlined in the paper begins by engineering interpretable features hypothesized as potential predictors of COVID‐19 incidence. Feature selection and hyperparameter tuning are then utilized with TSCV to identify the best features and hyperparameters for optimal model performance given a specific forecast horizon. While evidence supporting the utility of TSCV for auto‐regressive integrated moving average model with exogenous variables (TS‐ARIMAX) forecasts is lacking in this study, such an approach proves advantageous for gradient boosting machine forecasts (TS‐GBM). In Wyoming, for instance, TS‐GBM had a 34.9% improvement compared to naïve predictions, whereas GBM without TSCV only had a 15.6% improvement. However, TSCV also enhances interpretability for both TS‐ARIMAX and TS‐GBM models as this approach selects specific features, such as lagged values of COVID‐19 cases, based on forecast performance and forecast length. Future research should work to explore the influence of stationarity and model averaging on the performance of TSCV in forecasting applications.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(2)
University of Wyoming (US), University of Kelaniya (LK), Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.