The chemical enterprise braces for a second Trump presidency

With the dust settling after the US elections, chemists are trying to work out how a second Donald J. Trump presidency will affect their work and lives. Scientists in many corners are concerned—about their funding, about the politicization of their research areas, and about their intellectual freedom. Jennifer Jones, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, says scientists in federal and state governments who work in politicized fields like climate change are worried “their name is going on a list.” “President Trump has promised to fire government scientists and to dismantle scientific agencies,” Jones says. “Without strong federal science, historically marginalized communities bear the brunt of policies that benefit corporate profit over people and communities.” A scientist in the federal government, who spoke to C&EN on the condition of anonymity because they fear retribution, worries that some government scientists “might just choose to

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10235-polcon3
Primary Topic
Biotechnology and Related Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The chemical enterprise braces for a second Trump presidency

Leigh Krietsch Boerner, Rowan Walrath
C&EN Global Enterprise
Biotechnology and Related Fields
article

The chemical enterprise braces for a second Trump presidency

Leigh Krietsch Boerner, Rowan Walrath
article en

Abstract

With the dust settling after the US elections, chemists are trying to work out how a second Donald J. Trump presidency will affect their work and lives. Scientists in many corners are concerned—about their funding, about the politicization of their research areas, and about their intellectual freedom. Jennifer Jones, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, says scientists in federal and state governments who work in politicized fields like climate change are worried “their name is going on a list.” “President Trump has promised to fire government scientists and to dismantle scientific agencies,” Jones says. “Without strong federal science, historically marginalized communities bear the brunt of policies that benefit corporate profit over people and communities.” A scientist in the federal government, who spoke to C&EN on the condition of anonymity because they fear retribution, worries that some government scientists “might just choose to

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 102(35)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Biotechnology and Related Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.