Comparative performance analysis of different microfilaria testing methods for Dirofilaria immitis in canine blood

Microfilaria (MF) testing is an essential part of heartworm diagnosis and screening in dogs, and test selection should balance practical factors such as cost and time investment with the patient's risk of infection based on prevention status and history, clinical signs, and antigen testing results. This approach to MF testing will help minimize cost while avoiding failure to detect MF in infected dogs, especially when MF burden is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06537-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative performance analysis of different microfilaria testing methods for Dirofilaria immitis in canine blood

Joy V. Bowles, Lindsay A. Starkey, Rachel C Smith, T. G. Tomlinson
2 citations
Parasites & Vectors
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
0.78
article

Comparative performance analysis of different microfilaria testing methods for Dirofilaria immitis in canine blood

Joy V. Bowles, Lindsay A. Starkey, Rachel C Smith, T. G. Tomlinson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Microfilaria (MF) testing is an essential part of heartworm diagnosis and screening in dogs, and test selection should balance practical factors such as cost and time investment with the patient's risk of infection based on prevention status and history, clinical signs, and antigen testing results. This approach to MF testing will help minimize cost while avoiding failure to detect MF in infected dogs, especially when MF burden is low.

Parasites & VectorsVol. 17(1)
Oklahoma State University (US), Kansas State University (US), Auburn University (US)
Auburn University, National Institutes of Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.