Competing demand-side explanations and populism: cross-national variation in a recursive ideational system

This article models the rise of populism in a country as a sequential recursive system driven by the interaction of voters’ contextual demands and the supply of populist political responses. We introduce to this literature high-frequency media event data extracted from a corpus of two terabytes of articles drawn from 72 countries over six years using natural language processing. Further, we introduce vector autoregression to the study of populism, which allows us to model the way voters’ grievances and politicians’ rhetoric and policy responses influence each other bidirectionally over time. Our analysis reveals that voter demands and political responses are best modelled as a recursive system. Given the positive feedback loop, efforts to curb the growth of populism and limit democratic backsliding will require both addressing underlying grievances (i.e. demand) and weakening or substituting for the efficacy of existing populist rhetoric (i.e. supply).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Democratization
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2418457
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing demand-side explanations and populism: cross-national variation in a recursive ideational system

Anne Spencer Jamison, Witold J. Henisz
3 citations
Democratization
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
6.69
article

Competing demand-side explanations and populism: cross-national variation in a recursive ideational system

Anne Spencer Jamison, Witold J. Henisz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article models the rise of populism in a country as a sequential recursive system driven by the interaction of voters’ contextual demands and the supply of populist political responses. We introduce to this literature high-frequency media event data extracted from a corpus of two terabytes of articles drawn from 72 countries over six years using natural language processing. Further, we introduce vector autoregression to the study of populism, which allows us to model the way voters’ grievances and politicians’ rhetoric and policy responses influence each other bidirectionally over time. Our analysis reveals that voter demands and political responses are best modelled as a recursive system. Given the positive feedback loop, efforts to curb the growth of populism and limit democratic backsliding will require both addressing underlying grievances (i.e. demand) and weakening or substituting for the efficacy of existing populist rhetoric (i.e. supply).

DemocratizationVol. 32(3)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.