Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective

To establish a predictive model for clinical pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of a single fresh blastocyst in vitro fertilization (IVF). 615 patients (492 in training set and 123 in test set) who underwent the first single and fresh blastocyst transfer in the first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle performed in fertility centre of Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital from July 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. Conventional method such as logistic regression (LR), individual machine learning methods including naive bayesian (NB), K-nearest neighbours (K-NN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble learning methods including random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, Voting were used to establish the clinical pregnancy outcome prediction model, and the efficacy among different models was compared. Three major types of prediction models, including conventional method: LR (AUC = 0.707), individual machine learning classifiers: NB (AUC = 0.741), K-NN (AUC = 0.719), SVM (AUC = 0.761), DT (AUC = 0.728), ensemble models: RF (AUC = 0.790), XGBoost (AUC = 0.799), LightGBM (AUC = 0.794), Voting (AUC = 0.845) were established. It was found that the performance of the voting model was best. This study revealed that a voting classifier can provide a more accurate estimate of IVF outcome, which can assist clinicians to make individual patient counselling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Fertility
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2422918
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective

Qing Sun, Yulian Wu, Lianghui Diao, Zhenjuan Li et al.
3 citations
Human Fertility
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
3.33
article

Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective

Qing Sun, Yulian Wu, Lianghui Diao, Zhenjuan Li, Yong Zeng, Xin Huang, Hongzhan Zhang, Shuyi Yu, Feng Xiong, Chunyu Huang, Zhiqiang Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To establish a predictive model for clinical pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of a single fresh blastocyst in vitro fertilization (IVF). 615 patients (492 in training set and 123 in test set) who underwent the first single and fresh blastocyst transfer in the first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle performed in fertility centre of Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital from July 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. Conventional method such as logistic regression (LR), individual machine learning methods including naive bayesian (NB), K-nearest neighbours (K-NN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble learning methods including random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, Voting were used to establish the clinical pregnancy outcome prediction model, and the efficacy among different models was compared. Three major types of prediction models, including conventional method: LR (AUC = 0.707), individual machine learning classifiers: NB (AUC = 0.741), K-NN (AUC = 0.719), SVM (AUC = 0.761), DT (AUC = 0.728), ensemble models: RF (AUC = 0.790), XGBoost (AUC = 0.799), LightGBM (AUC = 0.794), Voting (AUC = 0.845) were established. It was found that the performance of the voting model was best. This study revealed that a voting classifier can provide a more accurate estimate of IVF outcome, which can assist clinicians to make individual patient counselling.

Human FertilityVol. 27(1)
Shenzhen Zhongshan Urological Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.