Digital competence of faculty members in health sciences measured <i>via</i> self-reflection: current status and contextual aspects

This descriptive study aims to determine the digital competence level of faculty members who teach in the health sciences, empirically considering possible contextual aspects. Two data collection instruments were used: a self-reflection questionnaire to assess digital competence, and a survey querying demographics and aspects of teaching and learning context. In total, 306 health sciences faculty members from six universities voluntarily participated the study. The results revealed that a majority of the faculty members have intermediate (integrator or expert) level of digital competence, which is described as being aware of the potential use of digital technology in teaching and having a personal repertoire for its use under various circumstances. Age, digital teaching experience, perception of work environment, and previous teaching experience in fully- or partially-online courses were identified as influencing factors for digital competence. Faculty members in health sciences were able to integrate digital technologies in their teaching practices. Health education institutions may facilitate the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning environments. Moreover, institutions or stakeholders should consider that digital competence requires practice and experience in meaningfully-designed digital environments and tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18456
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital competence of faculty members in health sciences measured via self-reflection: current status and contextual aspects

Aydan Aytar, Alina Vaškelytė, Hugo Leiria Neves, Johanna Fritz et al.
4 citations
PeerJ
Digital literacy in education
3.12
article

Digital competence of faculty members in health sciences measured via self-reflection: current status and contextual aspects

Aydan Aytar, Alina Vaškelytė, Hugo Leiria Neves, Johanna Fritz, António Manuel Fernandes, Camilla Wikström‐Grotell, Raimonds Strods, Aurelija Blaževičienė, Sultan Kav, Heikki Paakkonen, Çiğdem Baskıcı, Anne Söderlund, Halil Ersoy, Nora Jansone Ratinika
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This descriptive study aims to determine the digital competence level of faculty members who teach in the health sciences, empirically considering possible contextual aspects. Two data collection instruments were used: a self-reflection questionnaire to assess digital competence, and a survey querying demographics and aspects of teaching and learning context. In total, 306 health sciences faculty members from six universities voluntarily participated the study. The results revealed that a majority of the faculty members have intermediate (integrator or expert) level of digital competence, which is described as being aware of the potential use of digital technology in teaching and having a personal repertoire for its use under various circumstances. Age, digital teaching experience, perception of work environment, and previous teaching experience in fully- or partially-online courses were identified as influencing factors for digital competence. Faculty members in health sciences were able to integrate digital technologies in their teaching practices. Health education institutions may facilitate the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning environments. Moreover, institutions or stakeholders should consider that digital competence requires practice and experience in meaningfully-designed digital environments and tools.

PeerJVol. 12
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), Başkent University (TR), Arcada University of Applied Sciences (FI), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (PT), Mälardalen University (SE), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Erasmus+
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital literacy in education
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.