Cryophysiology of coral microfragments: effects of chilling and cryoprotectant toxicity

Coral reefs are being degraded at alarming rates and decisive intervention actions are urgently needed. One such intervention is coral cryopreservation. Although the cryopreservation of coral sperm and larvae has been achieved, preservation of coral fragments including both its tissue and skeleton, has not. The overarching aim of this study was to understand and assess the physiological stressors that might underlie coral fragment cryopreservation, understand the long-term consequences of these exposures to continued growth, and develop a health metrics scale for future research. Therefore, we assessed small fragments (~1 cm<sup>2</sup>) from the Hawaiian coral, <i>Porites compressa</i>, examining: (1) chill sensitivity; (2) chemical sensitivity to complex cryoprotectants; (3) methods to safely remove algal symbionts of coral for cryopreservation; (4) continued growth over time of coral fragments exposed to chilling and cryoprotectants; and (5) assessment of health and viability of coral fragments post the applied treatments. Corals were able to withstand chilling to 0 °C for 1 min and after 2 weeks were not significantly different from the live controls, whereas, corals exposed to complex cryoprotectants needed 3 weeks of recovery. Most importantly, it appears that once the coral fragments had surpassed this initial recovery, there was no difference in subsequent growth. Technological advances in cryo-technology promise to support successful coral fragment cryopreservation soon, and its success could help secure much of the genetic and biodiversity of reefs in the next decade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cryophysiology of coral microfragments: effects of chilling and cryoprotectant toxicity

Matthew J. Powell‐Palm, Anthony N. Consiglio, Christopher Page, Jessica Bouwmeester et al.
1 citations
PeerJ
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
0.46
article

Cryophysiology of coral microfragments: effects of chilling and cryoprotectant toxicity

Matthew J. Powell‐Palm, Anthony N. Consiglio, Christopher Page, Jessica Bouwmeester, Mary Hagedorn, Jonathan Daly, Claire Lager, Mindy Mizobe, Jake Carter, Riley Perry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Coral reefs are being degraded at alarming rates and decisive intervention actions are urgently needed. One such intervention is coral cryopreservation. Although the cryopreservation of coral sperm and larvae has been achieved, preservation of coral fragments including both its tissue and skeleton, has not. The overarching aim of this study was to understand and assess the physiological stressors that might underlie coral fragment cryopreservation, understand the long-term consequences of these exposures to continued growth, and develop a health metrics scale for future research. Therefore, we assessed small fragments (~1 cm<sup>2</sup>) from the Hawaiian coral, <i>Porites compressa</i>, examining: (1) chill sensitivity; (2) chemical sensitivity to complex cryoprotectants; (3) methods to safely remove algal symbionts of coral for cryopreservation; (4) continued growth over time of coral fragments exposed to chilling and cryoprotectants; and (5) assessment of health and viability of coral fragments post the applied treatments. Corals were able to withstand chilling to 0 °C for 1 min and after 2 weeks were not significantly different from the live controls, whereas, corals exposed to complex cryoprotectants needed 3 weeks of recovery. Most importantly, it appears that once the coral fragments had surpassed this initial recovery, there was no difference in subsequent growth. Technological advances in cryo-technology promise to support successful coral fragment cryopreservation soon, and its success could help secure much of the genetic and biodiversity of reefs in the next decade.

PeerJVol. 12
University of Hawaii System (US), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US), Taronga Conservation Society Australia (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), National Zoological Park (US), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Walker (United States) (US), Conservation Biology Institute, Texas A&M University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Smithsonian Institution, Zegar Family Foundation, Paul M. Angell Family Foundation, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.