The New CAP and the Participative Method in Decision‐Making: A Textual Analysis of the Italian Case

Abstract The main objective of this article is to analyse the role of the partnership approach in the decision process regarding the new CAP reform that guaranteed higher flexibility and better targeting. What was the impact of the multi‐actor decision‐making process on the reform process? How can policies be designed to increasingly listen to stakeholders' needs? To answer these questions, stakeholder interventions at the Partnership Table were analysed with a text mining and a sentiment analysis applied to the transcripts. Despite several weaknesses and biases in bringing national stakeholders to the institutional tables, the decision process moved towards a higher rate of flexibility, subsidiarity and transparency, overtaking the concept of ‘one size fits all’ that has dominated the CAP. The downside of this aspect is that the reform might favour member states with a solid tradition of CAP reception and administrative efficiency, able to move smoothly towards an effective participatory approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13703
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The New CAP and the Participative Method in Decision‐Making: A Textual Analysis of the Italian Case

Marco Vassallo, Giampiero Mazzocchi, Roberto Henke, Alessandro Monteleone et al.
1 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Urban Planning and Valuation
0.71
article

The New CAP and the Participative Method in Decision‐Making: A Textual Analysis of the Italian Case

Marco Vassallo, Giampiero Mazzocchi, Roberto Henke, Alessandro Monteleone, Alessandro Sorrentino, Tommaso Pomponi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The main objective of this article is to analyse the role of the partnership approach in the decision process regarding the new CAP reform that guaranteed higher flexibility and better targeting. What was the impact of the multi‐actor decision‐making process on the reform process? How can policies be designed to increasingly listen to stakeholders' needs? To answer these questions, stakeholder interventions at the Partnership Table were analysed with a text mining and a sentiment analysis applied to the transcripts. Despite several weaknesses and biases in bringing national stakeholders to the institutional tables, the decision process moved towards a higher rate of flexibility, subsidiarity and transparency, overtaking the concept of ‘one size fits all’ that has dominated the CAP. The downside of this aspect is that the reform might favour member states with a solid tradition of CAP reception and administrative efficiency, able to move smoothly towards an effective participatory approach.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 63(6)
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Urban Planning and Valuation
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.