Building a European Union ‘Treasury’: Explaining the European Commission's New Approach to Debt Issuance and Management

Abstract This article examines how the European Commission went from being an occasional participant in capital markets in the 1970s to an established bond issuer by the 2020s. As a result of these changes, the Commission has moved away from its traditional model of back‐to‐back lending using a wide array of funding instruments towards the regular issuance of EU bonds and bills in the style of a European treasury. Using a principal–agent approach, we ask whether this shift was driven by member states seeking to reap the benefits of collective borrowing or rather by slippage by the Commission aimed at spurring European integration. Our results show that the Commission's occasional attempts to advance wider political objectives were rebuffed by member states, which, nonetheless, ultimately embraced the idea of a European treasury. Our findings emphasise the logic of delegation over agency slack when it comes to the EU's evolution as a borrower.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13696
Citations
3
Primary Topic
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a European Union ‘Treasury’: Explaining the European Commission's New Approach to Debt Issuance and Management

David Howarth, Lukas Spielberger, Dermot Hodson, Iacopo Mugnai
3 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
1.62
article

Building a European Union ‘Treasury’: Explaining the European Commission's New Approach to Debt Issuance and Management

David Howarth, Lukas Spielberger, Dermot Hodson, Iacopo Mugnai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the European Commission went from being an occasional participant in capital markets in the 1970s to an established bond issuer by the 2020s. As a result of these changes, the Commission has moved away from its traditional model of back‐to‐back lending using a wide array of funding instruments towards the regular issuance of EU bonds and bills in the style of a European treasury. Using a principal–agent approach, we ask whether this shift was driven by member states seeking to reap the benefits of collective borrowing or rather by slippage by the Commission aimed at spurring European integration. Our results show that the Commission's occasional attempts to advance wider political objectives were rebuffed by member states, which, nonetheless, ultimately embraced the idea of a European treasury. Our findings emphasise the logic of delegation over agency slack when it comes to the EU's evolution as a borrower.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 63(4)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Loughborough University (GB), University of Luxembourg (LU), University of Warwick (GB)
European Commission, Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Building a European Union ‘Treasury’: Explaining the European Commission's New Approach to Debt Issuance and Management — David Howarth, Lukas Spielberger, et al. · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS