069. Evaluation Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients After Rectal Resection with Ileostomy

Background: Colorectal cancer where each person has a risk of 1:23 of colorectal and increases according to lifestyle colorectal is the 3rd highest cancer with a prediction of 3.2 billion new cases by 2040. Surgery in the form of resection with ileostomy is performed in up to 95% of cases of colorectal cancer. Quality of life after surgery with ileostomy can be evaluation with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29. Methods: Retrospective method with total sampling for 1 year 2023-2024 conducted at Sardjito Hospital, patient data obtained from medical records, questionnaire evaluation using interviews with inclusion criteria. Results: There were first complaints the patient in the form of 54% of bloody stools with the time of complaints range 6 months to 1 year. While 60% of patients came from hospital referrals using government health insurance. The age range is 58 years and dominated by women with BMI status of underweight patients and low education. Tumor borders at 5-10 cm from the anal verse with 75% performed adjuvant chemotherapy and 87% performed colonoscopy. Stage was predominantly stage 3 and adenocarcinoma cancer type up to 65%. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR29 evaluation results showed differences in emotional functioning at 6 months (p0.04) and decreased body image at 3 months postoperatively (p0.02). There were differences in global quality of life in parts but none in general (p>0.05). Conclusion: Overall, patients experience changes in emotional function at 6 months post and body image at 3 months postoperatively. overall global quality of life scores are no significant.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JBN (Jurnal Bedah Nasional)
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/jbn.2024.v08.is02.p069
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

069. Evaluation Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients After Rectal Resection with Ileostomy

Imam Sofii, Ahmad Farishal
JBN (Jurnal Bedah Nasional)
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

069. Evaluation Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients After Rectal Resection with Ileostomy

Imam Sofii, Ahmad Farishal
article en

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer where each person has a risk of 1:23 of colorectal and increases according to lifestyle colorectal is the 3rd highest cancer with a prediction of 3.2 billion new cases by 2040. Surgery in the form of resection with ileostomy is performed in up to 95% of cases of colorectal cancer. Quality of life after surgery with ileostomy can be evaluation with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29. Methods: Retrospective method with total sampling for 1 year 2023-2024 conducted at Sardjito Hospital, patient data obtained from medical records, questionnaire evaluation using interviews with inclusion criteria. Results: There were first complaints the patient in the form of 54% of bloody stools with the time of complaints range 6 months to 1 year. While 60% of patients came from hospital referrals using government health insurance. The age range is 58 years and dominated by women with BMI status of underweight patients and low education. Tumor borders at 5-10 cm from the anal verse with 75% performed adjuvant chemotherapy and 87% performed colonoscopy. Stage was predominantly stage 3 and adenocarcinoma cancer type up to 65%. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR29 evaluation results showed differences in emotional functioning at 6 months (p0.04) and decreased body image at 3 months postoperatively (p0.02). There were differences in global quality of life in parts but none in general (p>0.05). Conclusion: Overall, patients experience changes in emotional function at 6 months post and body image at 3 months postoperatively. overall global quality of life scores are no significant.

JBN (Jurnal Bedah Nasional)Vol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.