Floral morphology is associated with pollen deposition patterns on moth bodies

Abstract Floral syndromes can be a useful tool for predicting the identity of pollinators from floral morphology. However, the reliability of floral syndromes are still debated in the literature, and can often result in effective pollinators being overlooked. Pollination by moths has historically been associated with a floral syndrome comprising white tubular flowers that are heavily scented at night, but there have been few experimental tests of this association. To test whether moths preferentially land on flowers that are white and tubular, we allowed two moth species ( Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnaggel, 1766) and Ichneutica mutans (Walker, 1857)) to choose freely between three plant species ( Vaccinium corymbosum , Ericaceae, Pittosporum tenuifolium , Pittosporaceae, and two forms of Leptospermum scoparium , Myrtaceae) which represent four different floral morphologies. Anthers on the flowers were marked with fluorescent powder dye (pollen‐tracker), with the presence of pollen‐tracker on moth bodies after the experiment indicating floral visitation. We detected no floral preferences for any of the plant species by either moth species, suggesting moths will visit flowers that lack features associated with the syndrome even when in the presence of white, tubular flowers which might be predicted to be more attractive to moths. We also examined moth bodies to determine where pollen‐tracker was carried most often and if this varied among the floral types. Our results indicate that some moth body parts may be more important than others for pollen transfer, depending on the morphology of the flowers visited. After visiting tubular flowers ( Vaccinium and Pittosporum ), pollen‐tracker was most often located on the proboscis, but after visiting open‐access flowers ( Leptospermum ) pollen‐tracker was most often located on the legs. Future studies looking at the presence of pollen on moth bodies should consider this and ensure the entire moth body is examined for the presence of pollen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Austral Ecology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.70006
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Floral morphology is associated with pollen deposition patterns on moth bodies

Janice M. Lord, Max Buxton, David E. Pattemore, Anne C. Gaskett
5 citations
Austral Ecology
Plant and animal studies
5.15
article

Floral morphology is associated with pollen deposition patterns on moth bodies

Janice M. Lord, Max Buxton, David E. Pattemore, Anne C. Gaskett
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Floral syndromes can be a useful tool for predicting the identity of pollinators from floral morphology. However, the reliability of floral syndromes are still debated in the literature, and can often result in effective pollinators being overlooked. Pollination by moths has historically been associated with a floral syndrome comprising white tubular flowers that are heavily scented at night, but there have been few experimental tests of this association. To test whether moths preferentially land on flowers that are white and tubular, we allowed two moth species ( Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnaggel, 1766) and Ichneutica mutans (Walker, 1857)) to choose freely between three plant species ( Vaccinium corymbosum , Ericaceae, Pittosporum tenuifolium , Pittosporaceae, and two forms of Leptospermum scoparium , Myrtaceae) which represent four different floral morphologies. Anthers on the flowers were marked with fluorescent powder dye (pollen‐tracker), with the presence of pollen‐tracker on moth bodies after the experiment indicating floral visitation. We detected no floral preferences for any of the plant species by either moth species, suggesting moths will visit flowers that lack features associated with the syndrome even when in the presence of white, tubular flowers which might be predicted to be more attractive to moths. We also examined moth bodies to determine where pollen‐tracker was carried most often and if this varied among the floral types. Our results indicate that some moth body parts may be more important than others for pollen transfer, depending on the morphology of the flowers visited. After visiting tubular flowers ( Vaccinium and Pittosporum ), pollen‐tracker was most often located on the proboscis, but after visiting open‐access flowers ( Leptospermum ) pollen‐tracker was most often located on the legs. Future studies looking at the presence of pollen on moth bodies should consider this and ensure the entire moth body is examined for the presence of pollen.

Austral EcologyVol. 49(11)
Plant & Food Research (NZ), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.