Role Of Expanded Curb-65 Score In Predicting The Severity Of Community Acquired Pneumonia

Introduction: Assessment of severity and site of care decisions for community-acquired pneumonia patients (CAP) are very important for patients’ safety and optimal use of resources. Late admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) leads to increase the rate of mortality in CAP. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the new expanded CURB-65 score in comparison with CURB-65 in predicting CAP patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a cross sectional study which includes 90 patients presented with CAP in Government hospital for chest and communicable disease, AMC, Visakhapatnam Results: The study included 90 patients hospitalized with CAP of which mean (SD) age distribution is 51.49±16.63 years, with 64.4% being men and 83.3% of CAP patients had associated comorbidities. All patients (100%) had elevated serum LDH (> 230U/L), 87.8% had hypoalbuminemia, 8.9% had thrombocytopenia, and 4.44% had elevated BUN values within 24 hours of admission. Regarding outcomes, the ICU admission rate was 36.7%, the 30-day mortality rate was 14.4%, and 35.6% required mechanical ventilation. There was a significant association between tachypnea (respiratory rate >30/min), confusion, and thrombocytopenia (Platelet Count < 100×103/mm3) with 30-day mortality, according to univariate analysis. The current study found that as 30-day mortality for Expanded CURB score of (0-2), (3-4) and (5-8) is 0,4%and 9% respectively, requirement of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission rate were 2%,22%, 8% and2%,23%,8% respectively. Length of hospital stay increase as the score increase with median length of hospital stay being 7 days. Conclusion: Compared to CURB-65 and other assessment tools, the Expanded-CURB-65 score, which extends independent risk factors to 8 variables in assessing CAP severity, significantly improves identifying high-risk patients and thereby helps in early institution of appropriate therapy