Concentration‐Discharge Relationships Revisited: Overused But Underutilised?

ABSTRACT Over the past 50 years, concentration‐discharge (cQ) relationships have been widely used to analyse water quality dynamics. Nowadays improved availability of concentration ( c ) and discharge ( Q ) data at different spatial and temporal scales have led to a high popularity of cQ applications. However, despite their widespread use, we see persistent challenges in the integration of cQ relationships across temporal scales, and in the identification of the encoded processes. In this commentary, we show that different catchment processes may lead to similar cQ responses resulting in a lack of clear causality. We emphasise that cQ relationships applied at different time scales integrate different parts of the catchment and may, therefore, convey different information. Finally, we advocate for the careful use of cQ relationship as one, but not the only, tool in addressing ecohydrological questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15328
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Renal function and acid-base balance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concentration‐Discharge Relationships Revisited: Overused But Underutilised?

Andréas Musolff, Julia L. A. Knapp
9 citations
Hydrological Processes
Renal function and acid-base balance
3.05
article

Concentration‐Discharge Relationships Revisited: Overused But Underutilised?

Andréas Musolff, Julia L. A. Knapp
article en
9 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past 50 years, concentration‐discharge (cQ) relationships have been widely used to analyse water quality dynamics. Nowadays improved availability of concentration ( c ) and discharge ( Q ) data at different spatial and temporal scales have led to a high popularity of cQ applications. However, despite their widespread use, we see persistent challenges in the integration of cQ relationships across temporal scales, and in the identification of the encoded processes. In this commentary, we show that different catchment processes may lead to similar cQ responses resulting in a lack of clear causality. We emphasise that cQ relationships applied at different time scales integrate different parts of the catchment and may, therefore, convey different information. Finally, we advocate for the careful use of cQ relationship as one, but not the only, tool in addressing ecohydrological questions.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 38(11)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Durham University (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Renal function and acid-base balance
3.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.