Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation

Abstract Awareness of different ethical theories can support transformation-oriented researchers in navigating value-based decisions in co-production. We synthesize and explicitly link the literature on co-production and ethical theories in philosophy to initiate this awareness. Four key decision points in co-production projects are outlined that require value-based actions: (1) what to focus on, (2) who to include, (3) how to co-create and (4) how to continue. To discuss how project actions can be examined from different ethical perspectives, we synthesize the claims of four ethical theories and discuss them in the context of co-production project choices. The four ethical theories are: deontological ethics, utilitarianism, contractualism and virtue ethics. Overall, we argue for embracing pluralistic ethical perspectives when navigating decisions in co-production projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01582-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation

Henrik von Wehrden, Ying-Syuan Huang, Christiane Woopen, Stefan Partelow et al.
4 citations
Sustainability Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.13
article

Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation

Henrik von Wehrden, Ying-Syuan Huang, Christiane Woopen, Stefan Partelow, Christopher Luederitz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Awareness of different ethical theories can support transformation-oriented researchers in navigating value-based decisions in co-production. We synthesize and explicitly link the literature on co-production and ethical theories in philosophy to initiate this awareness. Four key decision points in co-production projects are outlined that require value-based actions: (1) what to focus on, (2) who to include, (3) how to co-create and (4) how to continue. To discuss how project actions can be examined from different ethical perspectives, we synthesize the claims of four ethical theories and discuss them in the context of co-production project choices. The four ethical theories are: deontological ethics, utilitarianism, contractualism and virtue ethics. Overall, we argue for embracing pluralistic ethical perspectives when navigating decisions in co-production projects.

Sustainability ScienceVol. 20(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Bonn (DE), Life & Brain (Germany) (DE), McGill University (CA)
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.