Magnetic Fabrics in Laminated Rocks of the Ilímaussaq Igneous Complex, Southern Greenland

Abstract Nepheline syenites from the ∼1.2 Ga Ilímaussaq Complex of southern Greenland are examined to assess the utility of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) fabrics as proxies for silicate petrofabrics. Mineral lamination is a relatively common structural feature in cumulate rocks, including in the Ilímaussaq intrusion, but there is little consensus on the process (or processes) responsible for its formation. The Ilímaussaq AMS data are combined with rock magnetic experiments and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) measurements to characterize the magnetic mineralogy and compare the magnetic fabrics obtained to the silicate petrofabric. The data show that Na-amphibole (arfvedsonite) is most likely the dominant control on the AMS fabrics in the coarse-grained nepheline syenites (referred to as kakortokites), and that the AMS fabric is inverse relative to the observed silicate fabric. The EBSD data for a kakortokite sample suggests that the petrofabric is defined by arfvedsonite and is wholly planar, with evidence of only weak cross-lineation of c axes. The fine-grained nepheline syenites (lujavrites), two of which have a well-developed lamination carried by Na-pyroxene (aegirine), appear to have composite AMS fabrics that are considered to be a consequence of a mixed aegirine (normal) and arfvedsonite (inverse) response. The combined datasets shed light on the mechanisms of fabric acquisition in both lithologies. In the kakortokites, the AMS fabrics and silicate crystallographic preferred orientations, as well as the lack of observed microstructural evidence for subsolidus intra-crystal deformation, support models invoking gravitationally controlled crystal mats in the development of the macro-rhythmic layering of these rocks. In the lujavrites, the strong planar fabrics revealed by both the AMS and EBSD datasets, with some evidence of subsolidus deformation, point to fabric formation and perhaps even aegirine crystallization at the postcumulus stage. The combination of EBSD and AMS fabric datasets is a powerful means of deciphering the processes responsible for mineral alignment in igneous cumulates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3749/2400008
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic Fabrics in Laminated Rocks of the Ilímaussaq Igneous Complex, Southern Greenland

William McCarthy, Michael Petronis, Michael A.W. Marks, P. L. Clay et al.
4 citations
The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.94
article

Magnetic Fabrics in Laminated Rocks of the Ilímaussaq Igneous Complex, Southern Greenland

William McCarthy, Michael Petronis, Michael A.W. Marks, P. L. Clay, Brian O’Driscoll, J. W. Geissman, Elisabetta Mariani, Carl Stevenson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nepheline syenites from the ∼1.2 Ga Ilímaussaq Complex of southern Greenland are examined to assess the utility of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) fabrics as proxies for silicate petrofabrics. Mineral lamination is a relatively common structural feature in cumulate rocks, including in the Ilímaussaq intrusion, but there is little consensus on the process (or processes) responsible for its formation. The Ilímaussaq AMS data are combined with rock magnetic experiments and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) measurements to characterize the magnetic mineralogy and compare the magnetic fabrics obtained to the silicate petrofabric. The data show that Na-amphibole (arfvedsonite) is most likely the dominant control on the AMS fabrics in the coarse-grained nepheline syenites (referred to as kakortokites), and that the AMS fabric is inverse relative to the observed silicate fabric. The EBSD data for a kakortokite sample suggests that the petrofabric is defined by arfvedsonite and is wholly planar, with evidence of only weak cross-lineation of c axes. The fine-grained nepheline syenites (lujavrites), two of which have a well-developed lamination carried by Na-pyroxene (aegirine), appear to have composite AMS fabrics that are considered to be a consequence of a mixed aegirine (normal) and arfvedsonite (inverse) response. The combined datasets shed light on the mechanisms of fabric acquisition in both lithologies. In the kakortokites, the AMS fabrics and silicate crystallographic preferred orientations, as well as the lack of observed microstructural evidence for subsolidus intra-crystal deformation, support models invoking gravitationally controlled crystal mats in the development of the macro-rhythmic layering of these rocks. In the lujavrites, the strong planar fabrics revealed by both the AMS and EBSD datasets, with some evidence of subsolidus deformation, point to fabric formation and perhaps even aegirine crystallization at the postcumulus stage. The combination of EBSD and AMS fabric datasets is a powerful means of deciphering the processes responsible for mineral alignment in igneous cumulates.

The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and PetrologyVol. 62(6)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Ottawa (CA), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University of St Andrews (GB), University of New Mexico (US), New Mexico Highlands University (US), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Tübingen (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.