Comparison of Initial Stress and Displacement On Vertically Displaced Canines Using Conventional Bracket System and Self-Ligating Bracket System – A Finite Element Study

Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare the initial stress and displacement in vertically displaced canines using finite element analysis. Both conventional and self-ligating bracket systems were evaluated at displacement heights of 2, 4, and 6 mm. Methods: Six finite element models of maxillary dentitions with canines vertically displaced by 2, 4, and 6 mm were developed using specialized software. Continuous archwire techniques were applied in both the conventional system with 0.022" × 0.028" slot MBT brackets (3M Unitek™) and the self-ligating system with 0.022" × 0.028" slot passive self-ligating brackets (DAMON Q by ORMCO), both utilizing a 0.014-inch CuNiTi archwire. The study calculated canine displacement, reactionary effects on adjacent teeth (lateral incisors and first premolars), and compressive and tensile stresses along the X, Y, and Z axes at 12 specific points. Results: The self-ligating bracket system demonstrated greater extrusion of the canine compared to the conventional bracket system, with the most significant movement observed in the 2-mm model, followed by the 4-mm and 6-mm models. Reactionary effects on adjacent teeth included intrusion and tipping away from the canine, most pronounced in the 2-mm model. Compressive and tensile stresses were higher in the conventional bracket system and decreased with increased displacement. Conclusion: For vertically displaced canines, using a continuous archwire with a self-ligating bracket system is more advantageous than a conventional bracket system, as it results in greater canine movement and less stress on adjacent teeth. However, its effectiveness diminishes with increased displacement height due to resistance caused by higher contact angles and decreased wire expression.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32592/ijorth.19.2.1167
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Initial Stress and Displacement On Vertically Displaced Canines Using Conventional Bracket System and Self-Ligating Bracket System – A Finite Element Study

Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
article

Comparison of Initial Stress and Displacement On Vertically Displaced Canines Using Conventional Bracket System and Self-Ligating Bracket System – A Finite Element Study

article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare the initial stress and displacement in vertically displaced canines using finite element analysis. Both conventional and self-ligating bracket systems were evaluated at displacement heights of 2, 4, and 6 mm. Methods: Six finite element models of maxillary dentitions with canines vertically displaced by 2, 4, and 6 mm were developed using specialized software. Continuous archwire techniques were applied in both the conventional system with 0.022" × 0.028" slot MBT brackets (3M Unitek™) and the self-ligating system with 0.022" × 0.028" slot passive self-ligating brackets (DAMON Q by ORMCO), both utilizing a 0.014-inch CuNiTi archwire. The study calculated canine displacement, reactionary effects on adjacent teeth (lateral incisors and first premolars), and compressive and tensile stresses along the X, Y, and Z axes at 12 specific points. Results: The self-ligating bracket system demonstrated greater extrusion of the canine compared to the conventional bracket system, with the most significant movement observed in the 2-mm model, followed by the 4-mm and 6-mm models. Reactionary effects on adjacent teeth included intrusion and tipping away from the canine, most pronounced in the 2-mm model. Compressive and tensile stresses were higher in the conventional bracket system and decreased with increased displacement. Conclusion: For vertically displaced canines, using a continuous archwire with a self-ligating bracket system is more advantageous than a conventional bracket system, as it results in greater canine movement and less stress on adjacent teeth. However, its effectiveness diminishes with increased displacement height due to resistance caused by higher contact angles and decreased wire expression.

ESIC Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.