SCALE FOR PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE IN DESIGNING INCLUSIVE LEARNING: CONSTRUCTION, VALIDATION, AND RELIABILITY

Scale development is essential in testing constructs and variables in social research, including education. Scales that meet the rules of validity and reliability are developed using standardized procedures. This research focuses on scale production to create reliable and valid construct measures to assess teacher knowledge in designing inclusive learning, using three frameworks, namely Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge, Backward Design, and Universal Design for Learning. Research on this issue involves measuring organizational and psychological constructs, which present unique challenges because they are generally unobservable, very abstract, often complex, and may consist of several different components. As a result of this complexity, developing this scale was challenging. The production of this scale followed Boateng et al., and the field test involved 259 pre-service teachers. The Rasch Rating Scale Model analysis was used to test the scale and produced 18 items that have high reliability (0.96). This scale can be used nationally to assess teachers' ability to implement inclusive education. The scale also applies as a teacher self-assessment tool for developing their competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi|JIITUJ|
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.33958
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SCALE FOR PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE IN DESIGNING INCLUSIVE LEARNING: CONSTRUCTION, VALIDATION, AND RELIABILITY

Astuti Wijayanti, Jamil Suprihatiningrum, Firman Walidi Salam, Muhammad Aditya Hidayah
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi|JIITUJ|
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
article

SCALE FOR PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE IN DESIGNING INCLUSIVE LEARNING: CONSTRUCTION, VALIDATION, AND RELIABILITY

Astuti Wijayanti, Jamil Suprihatiningrum, Firman Walidi Salam, Muhammad Aditya Hidayah
article en

Abstract

Scale development is essential in testing constructs and variables in social research, including education. Scales that meet the rules of validity and reliability are developed using standardized procedures. This research focuses on scale production to create reliable and valid construct measures to assess teacher knowledge in designing inclusive learning, using three frameworks, namely Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge, Backward Design, and Universal Design for Learning. Research on this issue involves measuring organizational and psychological constructs, which present unique challenges because they are generally unobservable, very abstract, often complex, and may consist of several different components. As a result of this complexity, developing this scale was challenging. The production of this scale followed Boateng et al., and the field test involved 259 pre-service teachers. The Rasch Rating Scale Model analysis was used to test the scale and produced 18 items that have high reliability (0.96). This scale can be used nationally to assess teachers' ability to implement inclusive education. The scale also applies as a teacher self-assessment tool for developing their competence.

Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi|JIITUJ|Vol. 8(2)
Prince of Songkla University (TH), Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID), University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.