Are they even there? How agri-environment schemes investments reach their target species in Dutch dairy-farmland, the case of meadow birds

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) implemented by farmer collectives for meadow bird protection in The Netherlands create complex landscape mosaics due to the variability of options and combinations farmers use. We propose a method to simplify this complexity, using the number of meadow birds potentially benefiting as the measure of success, and evaluate how AES combinations affect management success as a function of monetary investments. Between 2016 and 2022, we conducted field surveys to measure the density and distribution of Black-tailed Godwits across three land-use types: AES, site-protected areas, and intensive agriculture. AES fields were categorized into nest protection, inundation, delayed mowing, and herb-rich grasslands. We analysed the relationship between these managements, the area they cover, and godwit numbers, while also examining land area and subsidies. Intensive agriculture covered 74.3 % of the area but hosted only 23.2 % of the godwit population at low densities (0.063 godwits/ha). In contrast, protected areas (6.2 % of the area) and AES fields (19.5 %) supported 24.7 % and 52.1 % of the population at higher densities (0.48 and 0.46 godwits/ha, respectively). Among AES types, delayed mowing and herb-rich grasslands showed the highest godwit densities (0.66 and 1.25 godwits/ha, respectively) covering smaller areas (6 % and 1.1 %). These AES types pay the highest subsidies, while nest protection, covering 10.5 % of the area with lower godwit densities, pays the lowest. Although AES fields hosted about half of the godwit population, area-wise the focus remained on nest protection, and with intensive agriculture dominated the landscape. This may limit effectiveness at a population level, calling for re-evaluating conservation priorities and funding. • Protected sites and AES host more godwits at higher densities than intensive farmland. • Areas of site protection (6 %) and AES (20 %) host 25 % and 52 % of the godwit population. • Herb-rich grasslands, the least common and costly AES, had the highest godwit densities. • Nest protection, the most common and lower cost AES, had lower godwit densities. • Sustainable farming is needed to protect habitats and reduce dependency on subsidies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03286
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are they even there? How agri-environment schemes investments reach their target species in Dutch dairy-farmland, the case of meadow birds

Ruth A. Howison, Rienk W. Fokkema, Theunis Piersma, Luis Barba‐Escoto et al.
2 citations
Global Ecology and Conservation
Environmental Conservation and Management
1.42
article

Are they even there? How agri-environment schemes investments reach their target species in Dutch dairy-farmland, the case of meadow birds

Ruth A. Howison, Rienk W. Fokkema, Theunis Piersma, Luis Barba‐Escoto, Pablo Adrián Tittonell, Jean‐Yves Duriaux‐Chavarría, Marie Stessens, Egbert van der Velde, Jos C. E. W. Hooijmeijer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) implemented by farmer collectives for meadow bird protection in The Netherlands create complex landscape mosaics due to the variability of options and combinations farmers use. We propose a method to simplify this complexity, using the number of meadow birds potentially benefiting as the measure of success, and evaluate how AES combinations affect management success as a function of monetary investments. Between 2016 and 2022, we conducted field surveys to measure the density and distribution of Black-tailed Godwits across three land-use types: AES, site-protected areas, and intensive agriculture. AES fields were categorized into nest protection, inundation, delayed mowing, and herb-rich grasslands. We analysed the relationship between these managements, the area they cover, and godwit numbers, while also examining land area and subsidies. Intensive agriculture covered 74.3 % of the area but hosted only 23.2 % of the godwit population at low densities (0.063 godwits/ha). In contrast, protected areas (6.2 % of the area) and AES fields (19.5 %) supported 24.7 % and 52.1 % of the population at higher densities (0.48 and 0.46 godwits/ha, respectively). Among AES types, delayed mowing and herb-rich grasslands showed the highest godwit densities (0.66 and 1.25 godwits/ha, respectively) covering smaller areas (6 % and 1.1 %). These AES types pay the highest subsidies, while nest protection, covering 10.5 % of the area with lower godwit densities, pays the lowest. Although AES fields hosted about half of the godwit population, area-wise the focus remained on nest protection, and with intensive agriculture dominated the landscape. This may limit effectiveness at a population level, calling for re-evaluating conservation priorities and funding. • Protected sites and AES host more godwits at higher densities than intensive farmland. • Areas of site protection (6 %) and AES (20 %) host 25 % and 52 % of the godwit population. • Herb-rich grasslands, the least common and costly AES, had the highest godwit densities. • Nest protection, the most common and lower cost AES, had lower godwit densities. • Sustainable farming is needed to protect habitats and reduce dependency on subsidies.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 56
University of Groningen (NL), Fryske Akademy (NL), Bariloche Atomic Centre (AR), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Environmental Conservation and Management
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.