Sustainable solutions for co-gasification of sewage sludge and biomass: Insights from Aspen Plus, response surface methodology, and multi-criteria decision-making integration

This paper presents a novel framework integrating process simulation, optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to identify sustainable co-gasification solutions for sewage sludge (SS) and biomass. Gasifier modeling in Aspen Plus, validated with experimental data, evaluated five feedstock blend routes. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key gasification parameters, while Response Surface Methodology (RSM) optimized process routes by revealing complex relationships between variables and performance metrics. MCDM was applied to assess alternatives based on eight criteria covering environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The study introduced an integrated objective weighting method, leveraging data variations and correlations, alongside a vector-based ranking approach for prioritizing solutions. Results indicated that a biomass-to-sewage sludge ratio of 3:7, under co-gasification conditions of 649.72°C, 1.13 atm, and a steam to feedstock ratio of 0.5, achieved the highest sustainability score of 0.506. This configuration outperformed other alternatives in terms of sustainability. Validation through three distinct analytic methods confirmed the robustness of the MCDM framework. In general, this work integrates simulation, RSM optimization, and MCDM analysis into a streamlined tool, offering a systematic progression from process simulation to decision-making. It reduces the reliance on costly trial-and-error experimentation while ensuring optimal operating conditions and comprehensive sustainability evaluation. These contributions tackle key challenges in data handling, optimization, and assessment, enabling more sustainable and cost-effective environmental technology innovations. • Development of a framework to streamline simulation, optimization, and sustainability assessment. • Aspen Plus enables efficient simulation of biomass/sewage sludge gasification. • Identification of operational-target variable interactions by RSM, optimizing processes. • MCDM methods offer a comprehensive perspective for sustainability assessment. • Introduction of an integrated objective weighting method for weight assignment. • PRSRV ranking method proves effective for prioritizing gasification processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103894
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable solutions for co-gasification of sewage sludge and biomass: Insights from Aspen Plus, response surface methodology, and multi-criteria decision-making integration

Lichun Dong, Di Xu, Jinhai Yuan, Hailong Tang et al.
12 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.21
article

Sustainable solutions for co-gasification of sewage sludge and biomass: Insights from Aspen Plus, response surface methodology, and multi-criteria decision-making integration

Lichun Dong, Di Xu, Jinhai Yuan, Hailong Tang, Dan Mei, Jiangfeng Dong
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a novel framework integrating process simulation, optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to identify sustainable co-gasification solutions for sewage sludge (SS) and biomass. Gasifier modeling in Aspen Plus, validated with experimental data, evaluated five feedstock blend routes. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key gasification parameters, while Response Surface Methodology (RSM) optimized process routes by revealing complex relationships between variables and performance metrics. MCDM was applied to assess alternatives based on eight criteria covering environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The study introduced an integrated objective weighting method, leveraging data variations and correlations, alongside a vector-based ranking approach for prioritizing solutions. Results indicated that a biomass-to-sewage sludge ratio of 3:7, under co-gasification conditions of 649.72°C, 1.13 atm, and a steam to feedstock ratio of 0.5, achieved the highest sustainability score of 0.506. This configuration outperformed other alternatives in terms of sustainability. Validation through three distinct analytic methods confirmed the robustness of the MCDM framework. In general, this work integrates simulation, RSM optimization, and MCDM analysis into a streamlined tool, offering a systematic progression from process simulation to decision-making. It reduces the reliance on costly trial-and-error experimentation while ensuring optimal operating conditions and comprehensive sustainability evaluation. These contributions tackle key challenges in data handling, optimization, and assessment, enabling more sustainable and cost-effective environmental technology innovations. • Development of a framework to streamline simulation, optimization, and sustainability assessment. • Aspen Plus enables efficient simulation of biomass/sewage sludge gasification. • Identification of operational-target variable interactions by RSM, optimizing processes. • MCDM methods offer a comprehensive perspective for sustainability assessment. • Introduction of an integrated objective weighting method for weight assignment. • PRSRV ranking method proves effective for prioritizing gasification processes.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 36
Chongqing University (CN), Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhejiang Industry Polytechnic College (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.