Raw materials and building technologies in the public buildings of Pompeii after the earthquake of 62/63 CE: A diachronic analysis of mortars

The paper deals with the technological aspects of the construction site of Pompeii through the characterization of the mortars, focusing on the identification of raw materials, their supply areas, selection criteria and mixing techniques to evaluate the continuity and changes in the different construction phases. Thanks to a multidisciplinary protocol that integrates archaeological, architectural, minero-petrographic and geochemical analyses, the study reveals that the binders were obtained from burning limestones from Mt. Lattari, while the aggregates are compatible with products from the Somma-Vesuvius volcano. The mortars from the period before 62/63 CE are characterised by a careful selection and preparation of the raw material, while the mortars from the period after 62/63 CE indicate a less precise procedures, probably due to the urgent need for reconstruction after the earthquake. Despite these changes, the essential quality and hydraulic properties of the mortars remained intact, demonstrating the resilience of ancient building practises. • Investigate mortars from public buildings in Pompeii. • Continuity and changes in technologies and raw materials over time. • Resilience of ancient building practises in post seismic reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03943
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raw materials and building technologies in the public buildings of Pompeii after the earthquake of 62/63 CE: A diachronic analysis of mortars

Emma Cantisani, Valeria Amoretti, G. Della Casa, Sara Calandra et al.
2 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Building materials and conservation
1.03
article

Raw materials and building technologies in the public buildings of Pompeii after the earthquake of 62/63 CE: A diachronic analysis of mortars

Emma Cantisani, Valeria Amoretti, G. Della Casa, Sara Calandra, Gabriel Zuchtriegel, Matteo Maria Niccolò Franceschini, Celestino Grifa, Tommaso Ismaelli, Mariano Mercurio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The paper deals with the technological aspects of the construction site of Pompeii through the characterization of the mortars, focusing on the identification of raw materials, their supply areas, selection criteria and mixing techniques to evaluate the continuity and changes in the different construction phases. Thanks to a multidisciplinary protocol that integrates archaeological, architectural, minero-petrographic and geochemical analyses, the study reveals that the binders were obtained from burning limestones from Mt. Lattari, while the aggregates are compatible with products from the Somma-Vesuvius volcano. The mortars from the period before 62/63 CE are characterised by a careful selection and preparation of the raw material, while the mortars from the period after 62/63 CE indicate a less precise procedures, probably due to the urgent need for reconstruction after the earthquake. Despite these changes, the essential quality and hydraulic properties of the mortars remained intact, demonstrating the resilience of ancient building practises. • Investigate mortars from public buildings in Pompeii. • Continuity and changes in technologies and raw materials over time. • Resilience of ancient building practises in post seismic reconstruction.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 21
University of Sannio (IT), National Archaeological Museum (IT), Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree (IT), University of Florence (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Building materials and conservation
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.