A Comparative Study of Aortic Valve Neocuspidization Techniques: Formula vs. Template Methods of Neocusp Formation
Both techniques showed excellent mid-term hemodynamic performance and comparable intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The FM for AVNeo provides a cost-effective and practical alternative to the TM, offering similar clinical outcomes without the need for expensive templates; it has the potential to improve the accessibility of AVNeo, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, further research with larger cohorts and long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the durability and long-term benefits of the FM.
Authors
- В. В. Донцов (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-5213)
- Ivan Karpenko
- Roman Nikolaevich Komarov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-6415)
- Grigorii Esion (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-0357)
- Abubakar I Sidik
- Maxim I Tkachev
- Maxim L Khavandeev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-0524)
Institutions
- Sechenov University (RU)
- Russian New University (RU)
- National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A. Vishnevsky (RU)
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RU)
- Regional Clinical Research (US)
- Donetsk National Technical University (UA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2024-11-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73300
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.40