Legal Review Of Death Penalty Sanctions And Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Crimes Reviewed From The Perspective Of Justice

The crime of corruption in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, which was later updated by Law Number 20 Year 2001. This research aims to legally discuss the application of death penalty and asset forfeiture in corruption cases, by considering the principle of justice. The research uses a normative juridical method, in which data is collected from various applicable legal regulations, and the results are presented descriptively-analytically. Although the death penalty is regulated in Indonesian positive law, until now its implementation in corruption cases has never been realized. As a result, the applicable law has not fully provided an adequate sense of justice for the state and the people harmed by acts of corruption. On the other hand, the Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU) as an effort to recover state losses has been proposed. Asset forfeiture as an additional criminal offense is already regulated in Article 10 letter (b) of the Criminal Code. While the death penalty is the main punishment, both have different implementation procedures, but both aim to realize justice. Both the death penalty and asset forfeiture are expected to have a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption and reduce the number of corruption crimes in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i2.1299
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Review Of Death Penalty Sanctions And Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Crimes Reviewed From The Perspective Of Justice

Sukamto Kusnadi
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Legal Review Of Death Penalty Sanctions And Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Crimes Reviewed From The Perspective Of Justice

Sukamto Kusnadi
article en

Abstract

The crime of corruption in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, which was later updated by Law Number 20 Year 2001. This research aims to legally discuss the application of death penalty and asset forfeiture in corruption cases, by considering the principle of justice. The research uses a normative juridical method, in which data is collected from various applicable legal regulations, and the results are presented descriptively-analytically. Although the death penalty is regulated in Indonesian positive law, until now its implementation in corruption cases has never been realized. As a result, the applicable law has not fully provided an adequate sense of justice for the state and the people harmed by acts of corruption. On the other hand, the Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU) as an effort to recover state losses has been proposed. Asset forfeiture as an additional criminal offense is already regulated in Article 10 letter (b) of the Criminal Code. While the death penalty is the main punishment, both have different implementation procedures, but both aim to realize justice. Both the death penalty and asset forfeiture are expected to have a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption and reduce the number of corruption crimes in Indonesia.

International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)Vol. 4(2)
Universitas Islam Attahiriyah (ID), Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah (ID), Universitas Islam Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal Review Of Death Penalty Sanctions And Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Crimes Reviewed From The Perspective Of Justice — Sukamto Kusnadi · International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS