Jurisdiction of Hybrid Courts in the Light of International Criminal Law. The Case of Cambodia and Sierra Leone (Part II)

The idea of establishing hybrid or internationalized tribunals arose in the context of the law performance of international ad hoc tribunals of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the view of several experts. In addition, trough these courts an attempt was made to reach a compromise between the national criminal jurisdiction of the states and the international one. Or, in the opinion of those who promoted this concept, the involvement of local experts in the examination of illegalities committed on the territory of these states could awaken greater trust on the part of society in general and the victims, especially in the act of justice, and subsequently even lead to the start of the reconciliation process of the respective societies. We proposed two cases for this study, which are the most well-known — the Extraordinary Cambers for Cambodia and the Special Court for Sierra Leone.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studii Juridice Universitare
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.20.2.13
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisdiction of Hybrid Courts in the Light of International Criminal Law. The Case of Cambodia and Sierra Leone (Part II)

Ioan-Ciprian Dospinoiu
Studii Juridice Universitare
International Law and Human Rights
article

Jurisdiction of Hybrid Courts in the Light of International Criminal Law. The Case of Cambodia and Sierra Leone (Part II)

Ioan-Ciprian Dospinoiu
article en

Abstract

The idea of establishing hybrid or internationalized tribunals arose in the context of the law performance of international ad hoc tribunals of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the view of several experts. In addition, trough these courts an attempt was made to reach a compromise between the national criminal jurisdiction of the states and the international one. Or, in the opinion of those who promoted this concept, the involvement of local experts in the examination of illegalities committed on the territory of these states could awaken greater trust on the part of society in general and the victims, especially in the act of justice, and subsequently even lead to the start of the reconciliation process of the respective societies. We proposed two cases for this study, which are the most well-known — the Extraordinary Cambers for Cambodia and the Special Court for Sierra Leone.

Studii Juridice Universitare(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Jurisdiction of Hybrid Courts in the Light of International Criminal Law. The Case of Cambodia and Sierra Leone (Part II) — Ioan-Ciprian Dospinoiu · Studii Juridice Universitare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS