Analysis of Students' Scientific Literacy Ability in Solving HOTS-Based Chemistry Questions

Students' scientific literacy abilities are relatively low; apart from that, students are not yet accustomed to solving HOTS-based chemistry science literacy questions, especially in content, context, and science competency. This research aims to analyze the distribution of students' scientific literacy abilities in content, context, and competency. The instruments used are reasoned multiple-choice tests and essays. This research used quantitative descriptive research with a sample of all class XI Science students at SMA Negeri 2 Percut Sei Tuan for the 2023/2024 academic year. The results of data analysis show that the distribution of students' scientific literacy abilities in the content aspect is 71.33% in the content domain in the medium category, the procedural domain 57.11%, and the epistemic domain 56.99% in the low category. The distribution in the context aspect of the health domain was 66.08% in the medium category; the natural resources domain is 48.25%, and the environmental domain is 42.66%, which is in the deficient category. Moreover, the distribution in the domain competency aspect of explaining scientific phenomena is 55.13% in the low category; the domain of evaluating and designing investigations is 44.64%, and the domain of interpreting data and evidence scientifically is 46.68% in the deficient category.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24114/jipk.v6i2.60730
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Students' Scientific Literacy Ability in Solving HOTS-Based Chemistry Questions

Iis Siti Jahro, Debora Putri Sitorus
Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

Analysis of Students' Scientific Literacy Ability in Solving HOTS-Based Chemistry Questions

Iis Siti Jahro, Debora Putri Sitorus
article en

Abstract

Students' scientific literacy abilities are relatively low; apart from that, students are not yet accustomed to solving HOTS-based chemistry science literacy questions, especially in content, context, and science competency. This research aims to analyze the distribution of students' scientific literacy abilities in content, context, and competency. The instruments used are reasoned multiple-choice tests and essays. This research used quantitative descriptive research with a sample of all class XI Science students at SMA Negeri 2 Percut Sei Tuan for the 2023/2024 academic year. The results of data analysis show that the distribution of students' scientific literacy abilities in the content aspect is 71.33% in the content domain in the medium category, the procedural domain 57.11%, and the epistemic domain 56.99% in the low category. The distribution in the context aspect of the health domain was 66.08% in the medium category; the natural resources domain is 48.25%, and the environmental domain is 42.66%, which is in the deficient category. Moreover, the distribution in the domain competency aspect of explaining scientific phenomena is 55.13% in the low category; the domain of evaluating and designing investigations is 44.64%, and the domain of interpreting data and evidence scientifically is 46.68% in the deficient category.

Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran KimiaVol. 6(2)
State University of Medan (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.