Domain‐General Individual Differences in Visual Comparison: Generalisability and Stability of Visual Comparison Ability Re‐Visited

ABSTRACT Visual comparison is the ability to ‘match’ visual stimuli like fingerprints or faces and decide whether they are from the same source or different sources (e.g., fingerprint‐matching). Limited research has investigated individual differences in this ability. In this paper, we present the results of three studies that explore the generalisability and stability of five visual comparison tasks (fingerprints, faces, artificial‐prints, footwear and toolmarks). We report data from three new studies examining the generalisability and stability of footwear comparison (Exp. 1) and toolmark comparison (Exp. 2), as well as the generalisability of all five comparison tasks (Exp. 3). Our results reveal that visual comparison ability generalises across all five comparison tasks and has stable test–retest reliability over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70003
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domain‐General Individual Differences in Visual Comparison: Generalisability and Stability of Visual Comparison Ability Re‐Visited

Bethany Growns, Rebecca K. Helm, Mia Gough
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Domain‐General Individual Differences in Visual Comparison: Generalisability and Stability of Visual Comparison Ability Re‐Visited

Bethany Growns, Rebecca K. Helm, Mia Gough
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Visual comparison is the ability to ‘match’ visual stimuli like fingerprints or faces and decide whether they are from the same source or different sources (e.g., fingerprint‐matching). Limited research has investigated individual differences in this ability. In this paper, we present the results of three studies that explore the generalisability and stability of five visual comparison tasks (fingerprints, faces, artificial‐prints, footwear and toolmarks). We report data from three new studies examining the generalisability and stability of footwear comparison (Exp. 1) and toolmark comparison (Exp. 2), as well as the generalisability of all five comparison tasks (Exp. 3). Our results reveal that visual comparison ability generalises across all five comparison tasks and has stable test–retest reliability over time.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 38(6)
University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Exeter (GB)
University of Canterbury, University of Exeter
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.