Individuals With Extensive Support Needs and Mixed Methods Research: A Systematic Literature Review Across Education Subfields

Mixed methods research (MMR) can support enhanced understanding of complex educational issues, like the inclusion and support of individuals with disabilities in community and school settings. In this systematic review, we explored the extent to which MMR has been used in research exclusively focused on disability across special education (SPED), general education (GE), and disability studies in education (DSE; n = 115 studies). We examined research explicitly considering individuals with extensive support needs (ESNs) in this literature. We highlight the prevalence of MMR exploring topics relevant to individuals with ESN and features of this body of work, including (a) participants in these studies, (b) the presence of theoretical and/or conceptual framing for the research, (c) the goals/aims of the research studies, (d) the purposes for mixing, and (e) the data-generation methods used by the authors. We discuss patterns in the data that reflect differences across subfields, presumptions of competence, and ways ableism shapes research studies. Implications for research and practice to improve inclusive experiences for individuals with ESN are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241291475
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individuals With Extensive Support Needs and Mixed Methods Research: A Systematic Literature Review Across Education Subfields

Xueyan Yang, Hailey R. Love, Carly B. Gilson, Carly A. Roberts et al.
2 citations
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Disability Education and Employment
1.05
article

Individuals With Extensive Support Needs and Mixed Methods Research: A Systematic Literature Review Across Education Subfields

Xueyan Yang, Hailey R. Love, Carly B. Gilson, Carly A. Roberts, Melinda R. Snodgrass, Natalie M. Badgett, Jeremy Peterson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mixed methods research (MMR) can support enhanced understanding of complex educational issues, like the inclusion and support of individuals with disabilities in community and school settings. In this systematic review, we explored the extent to which MMR has been used in research exclusively focused on disability across special education (SPED), general education (GE), and disability studies in education (DSE; n = 115 studies). We examined research explicitly considering individuals with extensive support needs (ESNs) in this literature. We highlight the prevalence of MMR exploring topics relevant to individuals with ESN and features of this body of work, including (a) participants in these studies, (b) the presence of theoretical and/or conceptual framing for the research, (c) the goals/aims of the research studies, (d) the purposes for mixing, and (e) the data-generation methods used by the authors. We discuss patterns in the data that reflect differences across subfields, presumptions of competence, and ways ableism shapes research studies. Implications for research and practice to improve inclusive experiences for individuals with ESN are discussed.

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe DisabilitiesVol. 49(4)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Washington (US), University of Utah (US), Illinois State University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Seattle University (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Disability Education and Employment
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.