Treatment of sugarcane vinasse in AnMBR and UASB: process performance and microbial community comparison

Vinasse is a by-product of sugarcane processing which is often used in fertigation; however, the direct use of vinasse harms the environment and reduces soil productivity due to its physicochemical properties. Anaerobic digestion (AD) offers an alternative to mitigate part of the negative effects. Anaerobic high-rate reactors, which mainly rely on sludge granulation, are mostly used in AD of vinasse wastewater. However, the composition of vinasse such as high concentration of solids and organic matter, high salinity, low pH, and high concentrations of sulfate, affect granule formation, leading to sludge washout. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) present an alternative for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing a nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and no suspended solids. Research on sugarcane vinasse treatment using AnMBRs is limited. Most studies have employed submerged internal membrane modules, highlighting the need for further research with different reactor configurations to enhance process performance. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an external inside-out crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was compared to an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of sugarcane vinasse. At a volumetric organic loading rate of up to 6 g COD. L<sup>-1</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>, the UASB reactor reached 75% ± 7% of COD removal efficiency whereas the AnMBR generated a solids-free effluent and reached 88% ± 2% of COD removal efficiency. Microorganisms such as <i>Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Mesotaga, Syner-01, Dehalococcoidia</i>, <i>Bacteroidia</i>-DMER64, and <i>Methanolinea</i> were found as the most abundant. The results highlight the AnMBR potential as an effective alternative for treating sugarcane vinasse while overcoming the challenges posed by unsatisfactory sludge granulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1489807
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment of sugarcane vinasse in AnMBR and UASB: process performance and microbial community comparison

Gustavo C. Dacanal, Víctor S. García Rea, Beatriz Egerland Bueno, Marcelo Zaiat et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.37
article

Treatment of sugarcane vinasse in AnMBR and UASB: process performance and microbial community comparison

Gustavo C. Dacanal, Víctor S. García Rea, Beatriz Egerland Bueno, Marcelo Zaiat, Gustavo Bueno Gregoracci, Flávia Talarico Saia, J.B. van Lier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Vinasse is a by-product of sugarcane processing which is often used in fertigation; however, the direct use of vinasse harms the environment and reduces soil productivity due to its physicochemical properties. Anaerobic digestion (AD) offers an alternative to mitigate part of the negative effects. Anaerobic high-rate reactors, which mainly rely on sludge granulation, are mostly used in AD of vinasse wastewater. However, the composition of vinasse such as high concentration of solids and organic matter, high salinity, low pH, and high concentrations of sulfate, affect granule formation, leading to sludge washout. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) present an alternative for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing a nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and no suspended solids. Research on sugarcane vinasse treatment using AnMBRs is limited. Most studies have employed submerged internal membrane modules, highlighting the need for further research with different reactor configurations to enhance process performance. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an external inside-out crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was compared to an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of sugarcane vinasse. At a volumetric organic loading rate of up to 6 g COD. L<sup>-1</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>, the UASB reactor reached 75% ± 7% of COD removal efficiency whereas the AnMBR generated a solids-free effluent and reached 88% ± 2% of COD removal efficiency. Microorganisms such as <i>Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Mesotaga, Syner-01, Dehalococcoidia</i>, <i>Bacteroidia</i>-DMER64, and <i>Methanolinea</i> were found as the most abundant. The results highlight the AnMBR potential as an effective alternative for treating sugarcane vinasse while overcoming the challenges posed by unsatisfactory sludge granulation.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 12
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.