Long-term follow-up of thumb reconstruction with a heterotopic replanted finger: case report and literature review

Objectives This work aimed to study the long-term outcome and function of a heterotopic replanted finger. Methods Retrospective analysis of two cases of successful finger reconstruction after finger heterotopic replantation. One case was a severed thumb, and the other case was a severed finger. The average follow-up time was 10 years. The clinical outcome and function of the heterotopic replanted finger, including range of motion, grip strength, and sensory recovery, were analyzed,. A comparative analysis was conducted with patients who underwent thumb replantation in the same period. Results The two heterotopically replanted fingers survived. Five months after the heterotopic replantation surgery, a new thumb was reconstructed using the heterotopically replanted thumb and the free tarsometatarsal joint from the foot. In the other case, the finger was reconstructed 1 year later with a free anterolateral thigh flap and the heterotopically replanted finger. The movement of the thumb, the pinching of the fingers, the clenching of the fist, and the feeling recovery were all good. The patient was capable of independently performing daily life and work activities such as eating, dressing, writing, and so on. There was no significant difference in hand function between the patients who received in situ finger replantation and heterotopic replantation during the same period. Conclusion For severed fingers that cannot be replanted in situ in an emergency situation, heterotopic replantation and secondary reconstruction may be a feasible and practical surgical method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1465108
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term follow-up of thumb reconstruction with a heterotopic replanted finger: case report and literature review

Lei Liu, Yuliang Sun, Xingsheng Zhang, Yantao Pei et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
1.72
article

Long-term follow-up of thumb reconstruction with a heterotopic replanted finger: case report and literature review

Lei Liu, Yuliang Sun, Xingsheng Zhang, Yantao Pei, Zhe Ma, Gang Wang, Lei Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Objectives This work aimed to study the long-term outcome and function of a heterotopic replanted finger. Methods Retrospective analysis of two cases of successful finger reconstruction after finger heterotopic replantation. One case was a severed thumb, and the other case was a severed finger. The average follow-up time was 10 years. The clinical outcome and function of the heterotopic replanted finger, including range of motion, grip strength, and sensory recovery, were analyzed,. A comparative analysis was conducted with patients who underwent thumb replantation in the same period. Results The two heterotopically replanted fingers survived. Five months after the heterotopic replantation surgery, a new thumb was reconstructed using the heterotopically replanted thumb and the free tarsometatarsal joint from the foot. In the other case, the finger was reconstructed 1 year later with a free anterolateral thigh flap and the heterotopically replanted finger. The movement of the thumb, the pinching of the fingers, the clenching of the fist, and the feeling recovery were all good. The patient was capable of independently performing daily life and work activities such as eating, dressing, writing, and so on. There was no significant difference in hand function between the patients who received in situ finger replantation and heterotopic replantation during the same period. Conclusion For severed fingers that cannot be replanted in situ in an emergency situation, heterotopic replantation and secondary reconstruction may be a feasible and practical surgical method.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 12
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.