A learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration

Abstract Background Dashboards play a prominent role in learning analytics (LA) research. In collaboration activities, dashboards can show traces of team participation. They are often evaluated based on students' perceived satisfaction and engagement with the dashboard. However, there is a notable methodological gap in understanding how these dashboards support the nuanced process of student reflection. Objective This paper presents empirical evidence on how students from high and low‐performing groups reflect individually on their performance while using a Learning Analytics Dashboard (LAD). Methods We address this in the context of education in healthcare, wherein we captured actions and positioning data from a simulation‐based collaborative activity and generated a collaborative LAD. A total of 41 nursing students were invited to participate in a post‐hoc semi‐structured individual interview to use a collaborative LAD while answering a set of prompts to reflect on their individual and group performance. Students' reflections were coded and analysed using Bain's 5R reflection framework. We used epistemic network analysis to capture the dynamic reflection process and to understand the connections between the reflection stages (from low to high). We compared how different these connections were for students in high and low‐performing groups. Results and Conclusions Our results revealed that most students were only able to achieve low and middle stages of reflection. Yet, students in low‐performing groups predominantly followed low‐to‐middle stages of reflection. In contrast, students from high‐performing groups demonstrated the ability to transition between low‐to‐middle and low‐to‐high stages of reflection. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for both research and practice, particularly emphasising the necessity to scaffold reflection when using LADs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13088
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration

Namrata Srivastava, Viktoria Pammer‐Schindler, Linxuan Zhao, Dragan Gašević et al.
5 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
article

A learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration

Namrata Srivastava, Viktoria Pammer‐Schindler, Linxuan Zhao, Dragan Gašević, Roberto Martínez‐Maldonado, Vanessa Echeverría, Evelyn Palominos, Gloria Milena Fernandez-Nieto
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Dashboards play a prominent role in learning analytics (LA) research. In collaboration activities, dashboards can show traces of team participation. They are often evaluated based on students' perceived satisfaction and engagement with the dashboard. However, there is a notable methodological gap in understanding how these dashboards support the nuanced process of student reflection. Objective This paper presents empirical evidence on how students from high and low‐performing groups reflect individually on their performance while using a Learning Analytics Dashboard (LAD). Methods We address this in the context of education in healthcare, wherein we captured actions and positioning data from a simulation‐based collaborative activity and generated a collaborative LAD. A total of 41 nursing students were invited to participate in a post‐hoc semi‐structured individual interview to use a collaborative LAD while answering a set of prompts to reflect on their individual and group performance. Students' reflections were coded and analysed using Bain's 5R reflection framework. We used epistemic network analysis to capture the dynamic reflection process and to understand the connections between the reflection stages (from low to high). We compared how different these connections were for students in high and low‐performing groups. Results and Conclusions Our results revealed that most students were only able to achieve low and middle stages of reflection. Yet, students in low‐performing groups predominantly followed low‐to‐middle stages of reflection. In contrast, students from high‐performing groups demonstrated the ability to transition between low‐to‐middle and low‐to‐high stages of reflection. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for both research and practice, particularly emphasising the necessity to scaffold reflection when using LADs.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(1)
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Graz University of Technology (AT), Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), Monash University (AU), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Australian Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.