Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

The regulation of the execution of State Administrative Court (TUN) decisions in Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Court does not include a mechanism for executing TUN decisions, which in practice has caused many problems that undermine legal certainty and justice for the public. The focus of the writing is to provide an understanding to the public about the urgency of implementing execution in administrative court decisions. The main issues include two aspects: the obstacles faced by administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions, and solutions to address the compliance problems of administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions. The research method used is a normative research method. The research findings indicate that the obstacles in the implementation of TUN Decisions are due to the non-compliance of TUN officials and the lack of enforcement power for TUN decisions. The solution to address the compliance issues of TUN officials in executing TUN Decisions is to file a maladministration complaint with the Indonesian Ombudsman to exert pressure and revise the PTUN law to provide enforcement measures against the relevant TUN officials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspektif Hukum
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Ashari Ashari, Rachman Maulana Kafrawi, Riska Ari Amalia, Agung Setiawan
Perspektif Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Ashari Ashari, Rachman Maulana Kafrawi, Riska Ari Amalia, Agung Setiawan
article en

Abstract

The regulation of the execution of State Administrative Court (TUN) decisions in Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Court does not include a mechanism for executing TUN decisions, which in practice has caused many problems that undermine legal certainty and justice for the public. The focus of the writing is to provide an understanding to the public about the urgency of implementing execution in administrative court decisions. The main issues include two aspects: the obstacles faced by administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions, and solutions to address the compliance problems of administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions. The research method used is a normative research method. The research findings indicate that the obstacles in the implementation of TUN Decisions are due to the non-compliance of TUN officials and the lack of enforcement power for TUN decisions. The solution to address the compliance issues of TUN officials in executing TUN Decisions is to file a maladministration complaint with the Indonesian Ombudsman to exert pressure and revise the PTUN law to provide enforcement measures against the relevant TUN officials.

Perspektif Hukum
University of Mataram (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.