Protection of water resources from agricultural pressures: Embracing different knowledge domains in governance approaches

Abstract The remediation of nitrate and pesticide pollution from agriculture in drinking water resources has manifested itself as a complex and multifaceted challenge in Europe and in other continents. Addressing agricultural pollution in water resources requires cross‐sectoral approaches. The EU Water Framework Directive aims to build bridges among these sectors, but the often sectoral implementation by Member States prevents its potential from being fully explored. This study aims to contribute to the body of interdisciplinary knowledge on the driving forces towards water quality improvement from agricultural pollution by case study research in five European countries in an interdisciplinary setting. The cases have shown that the added value of voluntary practices is considerable for creating shared ambitions but limited for actual water quality improvement. Implementation of strategies should be supported by practical guidance and monitoring of outcomes that enables compliance testing and refines simulation models for the formulation of follow‐up actions. Dynamic interactions among the knowledge domains, for example, social‐economic context, the legal framework, and the state of the water system, help to identify necessary actions at the different stages of the policy cycle. Especially in the implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation stage of the policy cycle, there is a need for further studies in order to improve effectiveness, for example on the role of monitoring and evaluation, licensing, and the issue of scale in cross‐sectoral approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Governance
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2136
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protection of water resources from agricultural pressures: Embracing different knowledge domains in governance approaches

Antti Belinskij, Helle Tegnér Anker, H.F.M.W. van Rijswick, Morten Graversgaard et al.
Environmental Policy and Governance
Water resources management and optimization
article

Protection of water resources from agricultural pressures: Embracing different knowledge domains in governance approaches

Antti Belinskij, Helle Tegnér Anker, H.F.M.W. van Rijswick, Morten Graversgaard, Nicolas Surdyk, Frode Sundnes, Rozalija Cvejić, Cors van den Brink, Sandra Boekhold, Luke Farrow, Susanne Wuijts
article en

Abstract

Abstract The remediation of nitrate and pesticide pollution from agriculture in drinking water resources has manifested itself as a complex and multifaceted challenge in Europe and in other continents. Addressing agricultural pollution in water resources requires cross‐sectoral approaches. The EU Water Framework Directive aims to build bridges among these sectors, but the often sectoral implementation by Member States prevents its potential from being fully explored. This study aims to contribute to the body of interdisciplinary knowledge on the driving forces towards water quality improvement from agricultural pollution by case study research in five European countries in an interdisciplinary setting. The cases have shown that the added value of voluntary practices is considerable for creating shared ambitions but limited for actual water quality improvement. Implementation of strategies should be supported by practical guidance and monitoring of outcomes that enables compliance testing and refines simulation models for the formulation of follow‐up actions. Dynamic interactions among the knowledge domains, for example, social‐economic context, the legal framework, and the state of the water system, help to identify necessary actions at the different stages of the policy cycle. Especially in the implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation stage of the policy cycle, there is a need for further studies in order to improve effectiveness, for example on the role of monitoring and evaluation, licensing, and the issue of scale in cross‐sectoral approaches.

Environmental Policy and GovernanceVol. 35(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Utrecht University (NL), Aarhus University (DK), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), GGZ Drenthe (NL), Biotechnical Educational Centre Ljubljana (SI), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Finland University (FI), Agri Food and Biosciences Institute (GB), Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (FR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.