Extrapolation is not enough: impacts of extreme land use change on wind profiles and wind energy according to regional climate models

Abstract. Humans change climate in many ways. In addition to greenhouse gases, climate models must therefore incorporate a range of other forcings, such as land use change. While studies typically investigate the joint effects of all forcings, here we isolate the impact of afforestation and deforestation on winds in the lowermost 350 m of the atmosphere to assess the relevance of land use change for large-scale wind energy assessments. We use vertically resolved sub-daily output from two regional climate models instead of extrapolating near-surface winds with simplified profiles. Comparing two extreme scenarios, we report that afforestation reduces wind speeds by more than 1 m s−1 in many locations across Europe, even 300 m above ground, underscoring its relevance at hub heights of current and future wind turbines. We show that standard extrapolation with modified parameters approximates long-term means well but fails to capture essential spatio-temporal details, such as changes in the daily cycle, and it is thus insufficient to estimate wind energy potentials. Using adjacent climate model levels to account for spatio-temporal wind profile complexity, we report that wind energy capacity factors are strongly impacted by afforestation and deforestation: they differ by more than 0.1 in absolute terms and up to 50 % in relative terms. Our results confirm earlier studies showing that land use change impacts on wind energy can be severe and that they are generally misrepresented with common extrapolation techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Dynamics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1385-2024
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extrapolation is not enough: impacts of extreme land use change on wind profiles and wind energy according to regional climate models

Diana Rechid, Olivier Asselin, Marcus Breil, Daniela C. A. Lima et al.
3 citations
Earth System Dynamics
Climate variability and models
0.85
article

Extrapolation is not enough: impacts of extreme land use change on wind profiles and wind energy according to regional climate models

Diana Rechid, Olivier Asselin, Marcus Breil, Daniela C. A. Lima, Peter Hoffmann, Jan Wohland
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Humans change climate in many ways. In addition to greenhouse gases, climate models must therefore incorporate a range of other forcings, such as land use change. While studies typically investigate the joint effects of all forcings, here we isolate the impact of afforestation and deforestation on winds in the lowermost 350 m of the atmosphere to assess the relevance of land use change for large-scale wind energy assessments. We use vertically resolved sub-daily output from two regional climate models instead of extrapolating near-surface winds with simplified profiles. Comparing two extreme scenarios, we report that afforestation reduces wind speeds by more than 1 m s−1 in many locations across Europe, even 300 m above ground, underscoring its relevance at hub heights of current and future wind turbines. We show that standard extrapolation with modified parameters approximates long-term means well but fails to capture essential spatio-temporal details, such as changes in the daily cycle, and it is thus insufficient to estimate wind energy potentials. Using adjacent climate model levels to account for spatio-temporal wind profile complexity, we report that wind energy capacity factors are strongly impacted by afforestation and deforestation: they differ by more than 0.1 in absolute terms and up to 50 % in relative terms. Our results confirm earlier studies showing that land use change impacts on wind energy can be severe and that they are generally misrepresented with common extrapolation techniques.

Earth System DynamicsVol. 15(6)
University of Hohenheim (DE), University of Lisbon (PT), ETH Zurich (CH), Kjeller Innovasjon (Norway) (NO), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE), Ouranos (CA)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Climate variability and models
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.