Inherent ambiguity of negative polar questions in Korean and English

This study investigates the ambiguous interpretation of negative polar questions (NPQs) in Korean and English, emphasizing the role of syntactic structures in shaping these interpretations. It demonstrates that traditional polarity-based and truth-based frameworks are insufficient to explain the variation in NPQ interpretations. Rather, the placement of negation plays a pivotal role, influencing whether it is understood at a higher or lower syntactic level, which directly impacts the meaning of yes/no responses. Additionally, the research reveals that contextual factors and inherent biases significantly affect NPQ interpretations, leading to variable responses even within the same language, depending on the context. These findings highlight the need to integrate both syntactic and pragmatic considerations in understanding NPQs and open avenues for future research on real-time processing and contextual priming to further explore the complexities of NPQ interpretation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2024.09.110.435
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inherent ambiguity of negative polar questions in Korean and English

Keunhyung Park
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Inherent ambiguity of negative polar questions in Korean and English

Keunhyung Park
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the ambiguous interpretation of negative polar questions (NPQs) in Korean and English, emphasizing the role of syntactic structures in shaping these interpretations. It demonstrates that traditional polarity-based and truth-based frameworks are insufficient to explain the variation in NPQ interpretations. Rather, the placement of negation plays a pivotal role, influencing whether it is understood at a higher or lower syntactic level, which directly impacts the meaning of yes/no responses. Additionally, the research reveals that contextual factors and inherent biases significantly affect NPQ interpretations, leading to variable responses even within the same language, depending on the context. These findings highlight the need to integrate both syntactic and pragmatic considerations in understanding NPQs and open avenues for future research on real-time processing and contextual priming to further explore the complexities of NPQ interpretation.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 110
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.