(Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers

Abstract This issue focuses on a little-studied aspect of (inter)subjectivity (S/ IS) in language: the expression of S/ IS in different registers. In the introduction, we overview the background and approach, describe the central registers in connection with using S/ IS devices, and correlate the choice and frequency of S/ IS devices with the situative features of registers. The introduction also includes a brief overview of the articles in the issue. We have studied three groups of S/ IS devices: (1) pragmatic particles, (2) CTP markers based on complement-taking predicates, and (3) modal verbs. Our central data comes from the Estonian Pragmatic Corpus. We look mainly at the expression of S/ IS in seven registers, broadly divided into three groups: spoken, online, and printed texts. The papers on the issue deal with the use and development of different particles in registers of Estonian and the use of S/ IS differences between registers to develop metrics for distinguishing registers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00028.met
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers

Helle Metslang, Carl Eric Simmul, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Prillop et al.
2 citations
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
3.77
article

(Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers

Helle Metslang, Carl Eric Simmul, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Andriela Rääbis, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This issue focuses on a little-studied aspect of (inter)subjectivity (S/ IS) in language: the expression of S/ IS in different registers. In the introduction, we overview the background and approach, describe the central registers in connection with using S/ IS devices, and correlate the choice and frequency of S/ IS devices with the situative features of registers. The introduction also includes a brief overview of the articles in the issue. We have studied three groups of S/ IS devices: (1) pragmatic particles, (2) CTP markers based on complement-taking predicates, and (3) modal verbs. Our central data comes from the Estonian Pragmatic Corpus. We look mainly at the expression of S/ IS in seven registers, broadly divided into three groups: spoken, online, and printed texts. The papers on the issue deal with the use and development of different particles in registers of Estonian and the use of S/ IS differences between registers to develop metrics for distinguishing registers.

Journal of Uralic LinguisticsVol. 3(2)
University of Tartu (EE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.