Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers

Abstract The article analyzes the frequency of downtoners and intensifiers in seven Estonian registers based on data from the Estonian Pragmatics Corpus. These particles are most common in instant messaging, followed by institutional interaction, everyday conversation, online comments, printed fiction, media, and academic prose. The analysis revealed that previously offered situational features that increase frequencies (orality, spontaneity, dialogicity, everydayness and involved production) correlate only with frequencies of downtoners in comments, fiction and media. The frequency of downtoners in instant messaging is significantly higher than in spoken dialogues, and the use of all particles in academic prose is significantly lower than expected. We propose hypotheses to explain those anomalies. Ten especially frequent particles were identified: six downtoners and four intensifiers. Those particles account for 15% of all downtoners/intensifiers and account for 76% of particle use, with their proportion varying across registers from 87% in everyday conversation to 43% in academic prose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers

Elen Pärt, Liina Pärismaa, Helle Metslang, Carl Eric Simmul et al.
5 citations
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Phonetics and Phonology Research
2.54
article

Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers

Elen Pärt, Liina Pärismaa, Helle Metslang, Carl Eric Simmul, Andra Rumm, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Prillop, David Ogren, Külli Habicht, Andriela Rääbis, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article analyzes the frequency of downtoners and intensifiers in seven Estonian registers based on data from the Estonian Pragmatics Corpus. These particles are most common in instant messaging, followed by institutional interaction, everyday conversation, online comments, printed fiction, media, and academic prose. The analysis revealed that previously offered situational features that increase frequencies (orality, spontaneity, dialogicity, everydayness and involved production) correlate only with frequencies of downtoners in comments, fiction and media. The frequency of downtoners in instant messaging is significantly higher than in spoken dialogues, and the use of all particles in academic prose is significantly lower than expected. We propose hypotheses to explain those anomalies. Ten especially frequent particles were identified: six downtoners and four intensifiers. Those particles account for 15% of all downtoners/intensifiers and account for 76% of particle use, with their proportion varying across registers from 87% in everyday conversation to 43% in academic prose.

Journal of Uralic LinguisticsVol. 3(2)
Tallinn Health Care College (EE), University of Tartu (EE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.