Supporting prescriber progression: a group concept mapping study

Abstract Introduction Education reforms allow pharmacists to become prescribers earlier in their career and from 2026, new registrants will be independent prescribers.1 In NHS Scotland, an operational framework supports the development of pharmacist independent prescribing.2 We wanted to supplement the operational framework by identifying our core areas of prescribing to articulate prescribing progression and inform education and training provision. Aim To develop a core prescribing framework to support safe prescribing and a spiral approach to expanding scope of practice. Methods We conducted a participatory mixed-method approach using group concept mapping methodology.3 Phase 1 (brainstorming): all hospital pharmacists working in a patient-facing clinical role were invited to enter statements on a cloud-based platform (Padlet®) using the prompt ‘In my day-to-day practice I prescribe and/or make prescribing recommendations about the following medicines / conditions …’. The statements were triangulated with electronic inpatient pharmacist prescribing data over the previous three months. Phase 2 (sorting and rating): a project group comprised of pharmacists with different levels of practice and areas of clinical expertise, individually sorted the statements into groups based on the statements’ conceptual similarity and rated each statement by level of practice (post-registration foundation, advancing, advanced) and importance for including in a core framework (5-point Likert scale). R software applied multidimensional scaling to sorting data to create a similarity matrix, cluster map and Go-Zones. ChatGPT generated cluster titles. The project group discussed the results and following a few revisions, consensus was achieved on the content of the prescribing framework. This study was not considered research and was approved by the pharmacy quality improvement team in line with local governance process. Results Forty-three pharmacists participated in the brainstorming phase and generated 158 statements. Fourteen pharmacists participated in the sorting and rating phase. Multidimensional scaling analysis identified three clusters of prescribing activities: initiating, adjusting and deprescribing. The data identified activities involving initiating medicines and autonomous decision making rated at advancing/advanced level practice while adjusting/deprescribing medicines (often with the caveat of within guidelines, protocols or team decisions) was rated at post-registration foundation level. The prescribing framework includes the activities considered important and is organised by cluster and level of practice. Discussion / Conclusion This study provides a structured conceptualisation of prescribing across the levels of practice. The prescribing framework reflects the needs of our patients and hospital inpatient service and provides a scaffolded approach to progressing from inexperienced to more advanced prescribing roles. Post-registration foundation prescribing activities focus on processes or types of prescribing, whilst advanced are more autonomous and complex. Limitations we didn’t collect clinical area of practice as part of the demographic information for the brainstorming phase and some specialities may not be represented. Further work includes a training needs analysis and developing entrustable professional activities for core and higher risk areas of prescribing (e.g. post-operative pain). References 1. General Pharmaceutical Council. Guidance to support the implementation of the standards for education and training of pharmacist independent prescribers [online] Oct 2022 [Accessed 7 June 2024]. Available from: https://assets.pharmacyregulation.org/files/document/guidance-to-support-the-implementation-of-the_standards-for-the-education-and-training-of-pharmacist-independent-prescribers-october-2022.pdf 2. The National Acute Pharmacist Group and Scottish Practice Pharmacy and Prescribing Advisor Group. An operational framework to support the development of pharmacist independent prescribing in NHS Scotland. Version 1, May 2022 3. Trochim W. M., McLinden D. Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2017; 60: 166–175.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae058.070
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting prescriber progression: a group concept mapping study

Jane Scott, Caroline Souter, Constance Johnson
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Supporting prescriber progression: a group concept mapping study

Jane Scott, Caroline Souter, Constance Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Education reforms allow pharmacists to become prescribers earlier in their career and from 2026, new registrants will be independent prescribers.1 In NHS Scotland, an operational framework supports the development of pharmacist independent prescribing.2 We wanted to supplement the operational framework by identifying our core areas of prescribing to articulate prescribing progression and inform education and training provision. Aim To develop a core prescribing framework to support safe prescribing and a spiral approach to expanding scope of practice. Methods We conducted a participatory mixed-method approach using group concept mapping methodology.3 Phase 1 (brainstorming): all hospital pharmacists working in a patient-facing clinical role were invited to enter statements on a cloud-based platform (Padlet®) using the prompt ‘In my day-to-day practice I prescribe and/or make prescribing recommendations about the following medicines / conditions …’. The statements were triangulated with electronic inpatient pharmacist prescribing data over the previous three months. Phase 2 (sorting and rating): a project group comprised of pharmacists with different levels of practice and areas of clinical expertise, individually sorted the statements into groups based on the statements’ conceptual similarity and rated each statement by level of practice (post-registration foundation, advancing, advanced) and importance for including in a core framework (5-point Likert scale). R software applied multidimensional scaling to sorting data to create a similarity matrix, cluster map and Go-Zones. ChatGPT generated cluster titles. The project group discussed the results and following a few revisions, consensus was achieved on the content of the prescribing framework. This study was not considered research and was approved by the pharmacy quality improvement team in line with local governance process. Results Forty-three pharmacists participated in the brainstorming phase and generated 158 statements. Fourteen pharmacists participated in the sorting and rating phase. Multidimensional scaling analysis identified three clusters of prescribing activities: initiating, adjusting and deprescribing. The data identified activities involving initiating medicines and autonomous decision making rated at advancing/advanced level practice while adjusting/deprescribing medicines (often with the caveat of within guidelines, protocols or team decisions) was rated at post-registration foundation level. The prescribing framework includes the activities considered important and is organised by cluster and level of practice. Discussion / Conclusion This study provides a structured conceptualisation of prescribing across the levels of practice. The prescribing framework reflects the needs of our patients and hospital inpatient service and provides a scaffolded approach to progressing from inexperienced to more advanced prescribing roles. Post-registration foundation prescribing activities focus on processes or types of prescribing, whilst advanced are more autonomous and complex. Limitations we didn’t collect clinical area of practice as part of the demographic information for the brainstorming phase and some specialities may not be represented. Further work includes a training needs analysis and developing entrustable professional activities for core and higher risk areas of prescribing (e.g. post-operative pain). References 1. General Pharmaceutical Council. Guidance to support the implementation of the standards for education and training of pharmacist independent prescribers [online] Oct 2022 [Accessed 7 June 2024]. Available from: https://assets.pharmacyregulation.org/files/document/guidance-to-support-the-implementation-of-the_standards-for-the-education-and-training-of-pharmacist-independent-prescribers-october-2022.pdf 2. The National Acute Pharmacist Group and Scottish Practice Pharmacy and Prescribing Advisor Group. An operational framework to support the development of pharmacist independent prescribing in NHS Scotland. Version 1, May 2022 3. Trochim W. M., McLinden D. Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2017; 60: 166–175.

International Journal of Pharmacy PracticeVol. 32(Supplement_2)
NHS Lothian (GB), University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.