Abortion access barriers shared in “r/abortion” after <i>Roe</i> : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- <i>Dobbs</i> decision leak in 2022

With drastic changes to abortion policy, the months following the <i>Dobbs</i> leak and subsequent decision in 2022 were a uniquely uncertain and difficult time for abortion access in the United States. To understand experiences of challenges to abortion access during that time, we used a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic coding approach to analyse descriptions of barriers and their impacts shared in an abortion subreddit (r/abortion). A simple random sample of 10% of posts was obtained from those shared from 02 May 2022 through 23 December 2022; comments were purposively sampled during the coding process. In this sample of submissions (<i>n</i> = 523 posts, 88 comments), people described structural barriers identified in past research, including state abortion bans and gestational limits, high costs, limited appointment availability, and long travel required. Posters also commonly described known social barriers, including limited social support and abortion stigma. Several impactful barriers not well-described in past research emerged inductively, including wait time for receiving mail-ordered abortion medication, low credibility of online ordering platforms, and concerns about legal risks of accessing abortion or related medical care. The most common consequences of experiencing barriers were adverse mental health outcomes, delayed access to care, and being compelled to self-manage their abortion because of access barriers. This analysis provides timely insights into the experiences and impacts of abortion access barriers in a group of people with a range of engagement with clinical abortion care, lived experiences, and points in their abortion processes, with public health implications for mental health and abortion access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2024.2426921
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion access barriers shared in “r/abortion” after Roe : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- Dobbs decision leak in 2022

Lindsay Parham, Elizabeth Pleasants, Coye Cheshire, Cassondra Marshall et al.
6 citations
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Reproductive Health and Contraception
3.26
article

Abortion access barriers shared in “r/abortion” after Roe : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- Dobbs decision leak in 2022

Lindsay Parham, Elizabeth Pleasants, Coye Cheshire, Cassondra Marshall, Ndola Prata, Ushma D. Upadhyay, Karen Weidert, Eliza Dolgins, Emma Anderson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

With drastic changes to abortion policy, the months following the <i>Dobbs</i> leak and subsequent decision in 2022 were a uniquely uncertain and difficult time for abortion access in the United States. To understand experiences of challenges to abortion access during that time, we used a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic coding approach to analyse descriptions of barriers and their impacts shared in an abortion subreddit (r/abortion). A simple random sample of 10% of posts was obtained from those shared from 02 May 2022 through 23 December 2022; comments were purposively sampled during the coding process. In this sample of submissions (<i>n</i> = 523 posts, 88 comments), people described structural barriers identified in past research, including state abortion bans and gestational limits, high costs, limited appointment availability, and long travel required. Posters also commonly described known social barriers, including limited social support and abortion stigma. Several impactful barriers not well-described in past research emerged inductively, including wait time for receiving mail-ordered abortion medication, low credibility of online ordering platforms, and concerns about legal risks of accessing abortion or related medical care. The most common consequences of experiencing barriers were adverse mental health outcomes, delayed access to care, and being compelled to self-manage their abortion because of access barriers. This analysis provides timely insights into the experiences and impacts of abortion access barriers in a group of people with a range of engagement with clinical abortion care, lived experiences, and points in their abortion processes, with public health implications for mental health and abortion access.

Sexual and Reproductive Health MattersVol. 32(1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California System (US), Berkeley Public Health Division (US), Ibis Reproductive Health (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Society of Family Planning
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
3.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.