Judicial Oversight of Labour Arbitration Awards

This paper investigates the scope and limitations of judicial oversight in labour arbitration awards, focusing on the balance between arbitration autonomy and the need for judicial intervention. The research addresses the central question: To what extent should courts intervene in arbitration awards in the labour sector? Through a doctrinal analysis of statutes, case law, and scholarly perspectives, the paper evaluates how judicial oversight impacts labour arbitration, particularly in Nigeria, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Findings indicate that while judicial intervention is essential to ensure fairness and compliance with public policy, excessive involvement can undermine the efficiency and finality of the arbitration process. The study concludes that an optimal balance between judicial oversight and the autonomy of arbitration is critical to maintaining a functional and just labour arbitration system.