The odds are it's wrong: Correcting a common mistake in statistics

Abstract Binary logistic regression is one of the most widely used statistical tools. The method uses odds, log odds, and odds ratios, which are difficult to understand and interpret. Understanding of logistic regression tends to fall down in one of three ways: (1) Many students and researchers come to believe that an odds ratio translates directly into relative probabilities. (2) Alternatively, they learn that coefficients tell us whether the variables make the outcome more or less likely, without knowing how to interpret changes in the odds. (3) They may be instructed in how to calculate predicted probabilities, but the additional steps are too complicated for them to follow. Our key aim is to highlight and correct the common mistake of confusing differences in odds with relative risks. Simply reporting the odds ratio is unhelpful, however, so we describe an easy method of estimating probabilities for both binary and continuous variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching Statistics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12391
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The odds are it's wrong: Correcting a common mistake in statistics

Laura Watt, David Voas
5 citations
Teaching Statistics
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
5.66
article

The odds are it's wrong: Correcting a common mistake in statistics

Laura Watt, David Voas
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Binary logistic regression is one of the most widely used statistical tools. The method uses odds, log odds, and odds ratios, which are difficult to understand and interpret. Understanding of logistic regression tends to fall down in one of three ways: (1) Many students and researchers come to believe that an odds ratio translates directly into relative probabilities. (2) Alternatively, they learn that coefficients tell us whether the variables make the outcome more or less likely, without knowing how to interpret changes in the odds. (3) They may be instructed in how to calculate predicted probabilities, but the additional steps are too complicated for them to follow. Our key aim is to highlight and correct the common mistake of confusing differences in odds with relative risks. Simply reporting the odds ratio is unhelpful, however, so we describe an easy method of estimating probabilities for both binary and continuous variables.

Teaching StatisticsVol. 47(2)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The odds are it's wrong: Correcting a common mistake in statistics — Laura Watt, David Voas · Teaching Statistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS