Artificial Trust in Mutually Adaptive Human-Machine Teams

As machines' autonomy increases, their capacity to learn and adapt to humans in collaborative scenarios increases too. In particular, machines can use artificial trust (AT) to make decisions, such as task and role allocation/selection. However, the outcome of such decisions and the way these are communicated can affect the human's trust, which in turn affects how the human collaborates too. With the goal of maintaining mutual appropriate trust between the human and the machine in mind, we reflect on the requirements for having an AT-based decision-making model on an artificial teammate. Furthermore, we propose a user study to investigate the role of task-based willingness (e.g. human preferences on tasks) and its communication in AT-based decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v4i1.31766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Trust in Mutually Adaptive Human-Machine Teams

Myrthe L. Tielman, Carolina Centeio Jorge, Ewart J. de Visser, Catholijn M. Jonker et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Cognitive Science and Mapping
0.35
article

Artificial Trust in Mutually Adaptive Human-Machine Teams

Myrthe L. Tielman, Carolina Centeio Jorge, Ewart J. de Visser, Catholijn M. Jonker, Lionel Robert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As machines' autonomy increases, their capacity to learn and adapt to humans in collaborative scenarios increases too. In particular, machines can use artificial trust (AT) to make decisions, such as task and role allocation/selection. However, the outcome of such decisions and the way these are communicated can affect the human's trust, which in turn affects how the human collaborates too. With the goal of maintaining mutual appropriate trust between the human and the machine in mind, we reflect on the requirements for having an AT-based decision-making model on an artificial teammate. Furthermore, we propose a user study to investigate the role of task-based willingness (e.g. human preferences on tasks) and its communication in AT-based decision-making.

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 4(1)
University of Michigan (US), United States Air Force Academy (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.